期刊文献+

双目标下我国产业结构低碳优化:实现2020年减排目标 被引量:2

Industrial Structure Low-Carbon Optimization under Double Targets in Chinese Industrial Sectors: To Achieve Emission Reduction Target of 2020
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国面临国际气候谈判和国内经济转型的双重减排压力,为此中国政府提出了明确的2020年量化减排目标。通过构建工业行业双目标模型,模拟分析我国在排放强度约束、水资源约束、就业约束、行业产值上下限约束以及非负约束等条件下实现既定减排目标的工业产值和就业人数最大值,结果证实产业结构低碳化是实现减排目标的有效途径;调整参数值的模拟则证实一定条件下产值增大有助于实现排放强度减少这一相对量减排目标。因此,我国在转变经济发展方式中应在保持工业增长的同时注重工业结构低碳化升级,而严格控制高排放行业增长率是未来时期经济低碳转型的突破点。 China faces dual pressure of carbon emission reduction from international climate negotiations and domestic economy transformation,and Chinese government has announced the specific quantitative targets in 2020. This paper constructs an industrial model with double targets to analyze the results about industrial output and employment maximization with constraint conditions including emission intensity,water resource,employment,upper and lower bounds of output value and nonnegative constraint. The result confirms that industrial structure low-carbonization is an effective way to achieve the emission reduction target. The simulation results after adjusting the parameters confirm that output increase can help achieve emission reduction target of2020 under certain condition. Therefore,China needs to keep industrial growth and try industrial structure low-carbon optimization in the transformation period of economic development pattern,and strictly controlling the growth rate of highly polluting industries is the breakthrough point.
作者 张云 邓桂丰
出处 《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期118-124,155,共7页 Journal of East China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目(11YJC790289) 央财国际贸易重点学科带头人培养计划 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(12YS147)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 低碳经济 产业结构 低碳化 排放强度 low-carbon economy,industrial structure,low-carbonization,emission intensity
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

二级参考文献161

共引文献1837

同被引文献26

  • 1张巧良,宋文博,谭婧.碳排放量、碳信息披露质量与企业价值[J].南京审计学院学报,2013,10(2):56-63. 被引量:54
  • 2Luo,L. ,Y. C. Lan,and Q. Tang.Corporate Incentives to Disclose Carbon Information:Evidence from the CDP Global 500 report.Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting,2012,23 (2): 93 - 120.
  • 3Magness,V. 2006. Strategic Posture,Financial Performance and Environmental Disclosure:An Empirical Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting,Auditing & Accountability Journal,19(4):540- 563.
  • 4Femg J. J., (2003) "Allocating the Responsibility of CO2 over Emissions from the Perspectives of Benefit Principle and Ecological Deficit," Ecological Economics 46 (1) , 121-141.
  • 5Lenzen M., Murray J., Sack F., et al., (2007) "Shared Producer and Consumer Responsibility: Theory and Practice," Ecological Economics 61 ( 1 ) , 27-42.
  • 6Neumayer E., (2000) "In Defence of Historical Accountability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Ecological Economics 33 (2) , 185-192.
  • 7Rodrigues J., Domingos T., Giljum S., ct al., (2006) "Designing an Indicator of Environmental Responsibil- ity," Ecological Economic 59 (3) , 256-266.
  • 8Steininger L., Lininger C., et al., (2014) "Justice and Cost Effectiveness of Consumption-based Versus Produc- tion-based Approaches in the Case of Unilateral Climate Policies," Global EnvimnmentM Change 24, 75-87.
  • 9Wagner T. P., (2013) "Examining the Concept of Convenient Collection- An Application to Extended Pro- ducer Responsibility and Product Stewardship," Waste Management 33 (3) , 499-507.
  • 10Wei Y., Wang L., Liao H., Wang K., Murty T., Yan J., (2014) "Responsibility Accounting in Carbon Allo- cation- A Global Perspective," Applied Energy 130 (1) , 122-133.

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部