期刊文献+

微型种植体支抗对拔牙矫治病例的垂直向控制研究 被引量:13

Study on vertical dimension control during extraction patient treated with mini-implant anchorage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估利用微型种植体支抗关闭间隙对拔牙矫治病例的垂直向控制情况。方法:回顾研究26例安氏II类错牙合畸形或安氏I类伴双颌前突,拔除4颗前磨牙矫治的病例。根据采用不同的支抗方式,把所选病例分为A、B两组,每组13例。A组采用微型种植体支抗,B组采用Nance托+横腭杆(TPA)增强支抗,两组病例均利用滑动法关闭拔牙间隙。分析比较两组病例治疗前后X线头影测量的变化。结果:经t检验显示两组病例SN-MP、OP-SN、ANS-Me、U1-PP、U6-PP、Yaxis之间的变化具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与传统的Nance托联合TPA作为支抗相比,微型种植体支抗关闭拔牙间隙,能对患者的垂直向支抗提供良好的控制。 Objective: To investigate the vertical dimension control during extraction cases treated with mini-implant anchorage. Method: In this retrospective study, twenty-six subjects with Angle class 1I malocculusion or Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion who were treated with extraction of four premolars were selected. They were divided into 2 groups according to the type of anchorage used.Group A (N=13) received sliding mechanics with miniscrews for skeletal anchorage, Group B (N=13) received sliding mechanics with Nance arch and transplatal arch. Lateral cephalometric radiographs ob- tained before and after treatment were traced and differences in the skeletal and dental changes compared between the groups. Result:The differences of change in SN-MP,OP-SN,ANS-Me,U1-PP,U6-PP,Yaxis between two groups had statistic significance (P 〈0.05). Conclusion: Closing extraction space with mini-implant anchorage could provide more effec- tive control on vertical dimension than with Nance+TPA anchorage.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2014年第4期248-250,共3页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
基金 广西医疗卫生重点科研课题(重2010084)
关键词 微型种植体 垂直向 支抗 Mini-implant: Vertical dimension: Anchorage
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Klontz HA. Facial balance and harmony: an attainable objective for the patient with a high mandibular plane angle [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 114: 176-188.
  • 2Schudy FF. The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth: its implicationsin orthodontic treatment [J]. Angle Orthod, 1965,35 (1) : 36-50.
  • 3Kuhn PO. Control of anterior vertical dimension and properselection of extraoral anchorage[J]. Angle Orthod, 1968,38 (4): 340-349.
  • 4欧阳莉,周彦恒.使用种植体支抗对高角病例进行垂直向控制[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2013,20(1):2-7. 被引量:10
  • 5欧阳莉,傅民魁,周彦恒.正畸治疗中高角病例的垂直向控制[J].口腔正畸学,2008,15(4):186-188. 被引量:11
  • 6Stivaros N, Lowe C, Dandy N. A randomized clinical trial to compare the Goshgarian and Nance palatal arch[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2010, 32 (2) : 171-176.
  • 7MU padhyay, S Yadav,R Nanda. Vertical-dimension control during en-masse retraction with mini-implant anchorage [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138:96-108.
  • 8张翼,张磊,樊瑜波,宋锦璘,邓锋.微植体支抗滑动法内收上颌前牙的三维有限元研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2009,27(5):557-560. 被引量:27
  • 9EHH Lai,CCJ Yao,JZC Chang, et al. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary denti- tion: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal an- chorage[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 134: 636-645.
  • 10M Upadhyay, S Yadav, S Patil. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 134(6):803-810.

二级参考文献35

  • 1张晓芸,张静,贾绮林,许天民.MBT^(TM)托槽系统矫正病例支抗磨牙的三维位置变化[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2004,36(4):426-430. 被引量:4
  • 2罗毅,温秀杰.正畸种植体支抗的研究现状[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2006,33(5):398-399. 被引量:4
  • 3Schudy F. The rotation of the mandihte resulting from growth: its implications in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod, 1965; 35:36-50.
  • 4Haas AJ. A biological approach to diagnosis, mechanics and treatment of vertical dysplasia. Angle Orthod, 1980; 50:279- 300.
  • 5Kusnoto B, Schneider BJ. Control of the vertical dimension. Semin Orthod, 2000, 6:33-42.
  • 6Barton JJ. High-pull headgear versus cervical traction cephalometric comparison. Am J Orthod, 1972, 62(5): 517-529.
  • 7Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, et al. Mandibular plane changes during maxillary retraction. Am J Orthod, 1978, 74: 32- 40.
  • 8Burke M, Jacobson A. Vertical changes in high-angle Class Ⅱ, Division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofadal Orthop, 1992, 102: 501-508.
  • 9Chiba Y, Motoyoshi M, Namura S. Tongue pressure on loop of transpalatal arch during deglutition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 123: 29-34.
  • 10Chang YI, Moon SC, Cephalometric evaluation of the anterior open bite treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999, 115:29-38.

共引文献45

同被引文献109

  • 1邹毅军.探讨用两种不同方法植入微种植体支抗的稳定性[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(1):135-136. 被引量:2
  • 2陈进英,王大为,缪耀强.正畸治疗中支抗丧失的原因分析及临床处理[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2004,25(B07):311-313. 被引量:8
  • 3冯雪,孙蕙.口腔正畸加强支抗的特殊方法[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),1996,23(6):344-347. 被引量:5
  • 4赵迪,曹军,李小燕,于燕.骨性二类错患者上、下颌骨矢状结构病因机制分析[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(1):95-97. 被引量:31
  • 5Kim J, Heo G, Laqravere MO. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to piaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod, 2014, 84(3): 443-450.
  • 6Shukla D, Chowdhry A, Bablani D, et al. Establishing the reliability of palatal rugae pattern in individual identification (following orthodontic treatment). J Forensic Odontostomatol, 2011, 29( 1 ): 20-29.
  • 7Abdel-Aziz HM, Sabet NE. Palatal rugae area: a landmark for analysis of pre- and post-orthodontically treated adult Egyptian patients. East Mediterr Health J, 2001, 7( 1-2): 60-66.
  • 8Chen G, Chen S, Zhang XY, et al. Stable region for maxillary dental cast superimposition in adults, studied with the aid of stable miniscrews. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2011, 14(2):70-79.
  • 9刘海波,冯雪,吴晓雪,等.不同角度摇椅弓联合种植体支抗内收上牙列的三维有限元分析.中华口腔医学杂志,2012,47(su-ppl.1):132-136.
  • 10Koyama I, Iino S, Abe Y, et al. Differences between sliding mechanics with implant anchorage and straight-pull headgear and inter- maxillary elastic in adults with bimaxillary protrusion. Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33(2):126-131.

引证文献13

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部