摘要
目的:观察对比用针刺与西药治疗重度痤疮的临床疗效。方法:70例随机分为两组各35例,针刺组用体针、火针、梅花针、拔罐等疗法治疗,西药组用异维A酸口服,2个月后观察对比两组临床疗效及不良反应,并进行2个月的随访,统计复发率。结果:针刺组愈显率85.71%,西药组愈显率65.71%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。针刺组复发率8.57%,西药组复发率25.71%,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。针刺组不良反应明显少于西药组。结论:针刺治疗重度痤疮疗效好,不良反应少,且复发率低。
Objective : To observe and compare the clinical effects of needling and western medicine for treatment of severe acne.Method: 70 patients with severe acne were randomly divided into 2 groups both with 35 cases accrording to different treatment methods.Needling group was given body needle, fire needle, seven-star needle and cupping for treatment while western medicine group was given orally-taken isotretinoin for treatment.Clinical effects and adverse reactions of the 2 groups were observed and compared after 2 months treament.Reoccurrence rate was counted after a follow-up visit 2 month later.Result:After treatments, markedly effective rate of needling group was 87.51% obviously higher than western medicine group 65.71% ( P〈0.05 ) .Adverse reactions of needling group were obviously less than western medicine group.Reoccurrence rate of needling group was 8.57% obviously lower than western medicine group 25.71% (P〈0.05) .Conclusion: Needling therapy for treatment of severe ache has excellent clinical effects with few adverse reactions and low reoccurrece rate, so it is worth of being popularized clinically.
出处
《实用中医药杂志》
2014年第5期442-444,共3页
Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
针刺
火针
梅花针
异维A酸
重度痤疮
疗效
Needling
Fire Needle
Seven-star Needle
Isotretinoin
Severe Acne
Clinical Effect