期刊文献+

CYP1B1基因Leu432Val位点多态性与头颈癌易感性的Meta分析 被引量:1

Association between CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism and head and neck cancer risk:a Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:运用Meta分析方法研究CYP1B1基因Leu432Val位点多态性与头颈癌易感性的发生风险。方法:检索CNKI和PubMed数据库中有关CYP1B1基因Leu432Val位点多态性与头颈癌易感性关联研究的文献。对符合纳入标准的文献进行资料提取后,以OR值和95%可信区间为效应指标,应用STATA 11.0软件进行Meta分析,并对发表偏倚进行检测。结果:纳入5个对照研究,共计1580例头颈癌患者和2076例正常对照人群。Meta分析结果显示,总人群中,CYP1B1基因Leu432Val位点多态性与头颈癌易感性之间有显著关联(Val vs.Leu:OR=1.13,95%CI=1.03-1.25,P=0.014;Val/Val vs.Leu/Leu:OR=1.30,95%CI=1.06-1.60,P=0.013;Val/Val vs.Leu/Leu+Leu/Val:OR=1.23,95%CI=1.05-1.46,P=0.013)。在针对种族的亚组分析中,发现CYP1B1基因Leu432Val位点多态性可能会增加欧洲人群发生头颈癌的风险。结论:CYP1B1基因Leu432Val位点多态性可能是增加欧洲人群发生头颈癌易感性的危险因素。 Objective: To investigate the association between CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism and head and neck cancer risk by using Meta - analysis. Methods:The relevant literatures were searched. The data of genotype dis- tributions and other information were extracted in the groups of patients and healthy control, odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and publish bias was annlyzed with STATA 11.0 software. Results: Five published case- control studies including 1580 patients with head and neck cancer and 2076 controls were selected. Overall, significant elevate association between CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism and head and neck cancer risk were found in ( Val vs. Leu : OR = 1.13,95 % CI = 1.03 - 1.25, P = 0. 014 ; Val/Val vs. Leu/Leu : OR = 1.30,95 % CI = 1.06 - 1.60, P = 0. 013 ;Val/Val vs. Leu/Leu + Leu/Val : OR = 1.23,95% CI = 1.05 - 1.46, P = 0. 013 ). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, the similar association was detected in Caucasian. Conclusion : This Meta - analysis demon- strates that CYP1B1 Leu432Val polymorphism may be a risk factor for developing head and neck cancer.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2014年第4期799-802,共4页 Journal of Modern Oncology
基金 湖北省教育厅重点项目(编号:D20122405) 湖北医药学院附属太和医院科研启动基金(编号:2011QD05 2010D22)
关键词 头颈癌 细胞色素P4501B1 多态性 META分析 head and neck cancer CYP1 B1 polymorphism Meta - analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1王吉耀.走出循证医学的误区[J].中华医学杂志,2004,84(12):969-970. 被引量:23
  • 2Guyatt GH,Rennie D,Meade MO,et al.Users’’Guides to the Medical Literature:A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice,2008.
  • 3Guyatt G H,Rennie D,Hayward R.Users’guides to the medical literature:A manual for evidence-based clinical practice,2002.
  • 4How to read clinical journals:5.To distinguish usefulfrom useless or even harmful therapy[J]Can Med AssocJ,1981.
  • 5Porter S,O’’Halloran P,Morrow E.Bringing values backinto evidence-based nursing:the role of patients in re-sisting empiricismAdvances in Nursing Science,2011.
  • 6Etminan M,Wright JM,Carleton BC.Evidence-based pharmacotherapy:review of basic concepts and applications in clinical practiceAnnals of Pharmacotherapy,1998.
  • 7Hróbjartsson A,Gotzsche PC,Gluud C.The controlledclinical trial turns 100 years:Fibiger’’s trial of serumtreatment of diphtheriaBritish Medical Journal,1998.
  • 8A Medical Research Council Investigation.StreptomycinTreatment of Pulmonary TuberculosisBritish Medical Journal,1948.
  • 9SackettCanadian Medical Association Journal.
  • 10How to read clinical journals: IV. To determine etiology or causationCanadian Medical Association Journal,1981.

共引文献42

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部