期刊文献+

应用层次分析法研究生物医学论文作者的贡献 被引量:1

Apportionment of co-authors' contribution for a biomedical scientific paper: An analytical process approach
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 应用层次分析法研究生物医学论文作者的贡献.方法 确定生物医学论文的贡献之处的重要指标,再将这些指标分类、整理成层级化的结构.应用层次分析法确定层级化结构一级指标和二级指标的贡献权重值,权重值通过一致性检验即是下次指标对上级指标的贡献值.结果 在5个初级维度指标,提出科学问题的贡献值最大,为0.4355,其次为设计方案和分析数据,贡献值分别是0.2873和0.1521.在10个次级维度指标中,建立假设、制定方案、解释数据和修订文稿的贡献值较大,分别为0.9、0.6667、0.8和0.833.结论 层次分析法可有效量化生物医学论文作者的贡献. Objective To determine co-author contribution for a biomedical scientific paper de- scribing collaborative research by an analytical process model. Methods The important features of contribution were identified, categorized and organized into a logical hierarchy consisting of the main dimensions and sub dimensions. A face-to-face survey was conducted to obtain data about their relative importance from co-authors. Analytical hierarchy process methodology was used to determine the rela- tive important weights from main dimensions and sub-dimensions along with the consistency. Results Among the 5 main dimensions, all authors considered problem statement as the most important with a weight of 0. 4355, and considered research design and data analysis taking the 2nd and 3rd positions. Among the 10 sub-dimensions, hypothesis construction, method development, result interpretation, and critical revision of manuscript were considered the most important contributions. Conclusion Ana- lytical hierarchy process effectively supportto establish the co-authors' priorties for a biomedical scientific paper.
出处 《中华医学科研管理杂志》 2014年第2期167-171,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
关键词 层次分析法 生物医学论文 作者贡献 Analytic hierarchy process Biomedical scientific paper Authorship contribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1ICMJE. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research Authorship and Contributorship[EB/ OL]. [2013-01-08]. http://www, icmje, org/ethical_lauthor. html.
  • 2Reinhardt U. Divide et impera: protecting the growth of health care incomes (COSTS)[J]. Health Econ, 2012,21(1):41-54.
  • 3Bracale U, Rovani M, Bracale M, et al. Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: recta-analysis of short-term outcomes[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2012, 21 (3) :150-60.
  • 4Bridges JF, Mohamed AF, Finnern HW, et al, Hauber AB. Patientst preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non- small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysis[J]. Lung Cancer, 2012,77(1) :224-231.
  • 5de Bekker-Groh EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice ex- periments in health economics: a review of the literature[J]. Health Econ, 2012,21(2) : 145-172.
  • 6Scholl A, Manthey L, helm R,et al. Solving multiattribute de- sign problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint a- nalysis: an empirical comparison[J]. Bur J Oper Res, 2005, 164(3) :760-777.
  • 7Ijzerman M, van Til A, Bridges JF. comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation [J]. Patient, 2012;5(1) :45-56.

同被引文献28

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部