期刊文献+

Validity of the two-term Boltzmann approximation employed in the fluid model for high-power microwave breakdown in gas 被引量:2

Validity of the two-term Boltzmann approximation employed in the fluid model for high-power microwave breakdown in gas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The electron energy distribution function (EEDF), predicted by the Boltzmann equation solver BOLSIG+ based on the two-term approximation, is introduced into the fluid model for simulating the high-power microwave (HPM) breakdown in argon, nitrogen, and air, and its validity is examined by comparing with the results of particle-in-cell Monte Carlo collision (PIC/MCC) simulations as well as the experimental data. Numerical results show that, the breakdown time of the fluid model with the Maxwellian EEDF matches that of the PIC/MCC simulations in nitrogen; however, in argon under high pressures, the results from the Maxwellian EEDF were poor. This is due to an overestimation of the energy tail of the Maxwellian EEDF in argon breakdown. The prediction of the fluid model with the BOLSIG+ EEDF, however, agrees very well with the PIC/MCC prediction in nitrogen and argon over a wide range of pressures. The accuracy of the fluid model with the BOLSIG+ EEDF is also verified by the experimental results of the air breakdown. The electron energy distribution function (EEDF), predicted by the Boltzmann equation solver BOLSIG+ based on the two-term approximation, is introduced into the fluid model for simulating the high-power microwave (HPM) breakdown in argon, nitrogen, and air, and its validity is examined by comparing with the results of particle-in-cell Monte Carlo collision (PIC/MCC) simulations as well as the experimental data. Numerical results show that, the breakdown time of the fluid model with the Maxwellian EEDF matches that of the PIC/MCC simulations in nitrogen; however, in argon under high pressures, the results from the Maxwellian EEDF were poor. This is due to an overestimation of the energy tail of the Maxwellian EEDF in argon breakdown. The prediction of the fluid model with the BOLSIG+ EEDF, however, agrees very well with the PIC/MCC prediction in nitrogen and argon over a wide range of pressures. The accuracy of the fluid model with the BOLSIG+ EEDF is also verified by the experimental results of the air breakdown.
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第5期380-384,共5页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China(Grant No.2013CB328904) the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities,China the Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Cognitive Radio and Information Processing of Ministry of Education of China
关键词 fluid model electron energy distribution function gas breakdown particle-in-cell Monte Carlocollision (PIC/MCC) simulation fluid model, electron energy distribution function, gas breakdown, particle-in-cell Monte Carlocollision (PIC/MCC) simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Li W, Liu Y, Shu T and Qian B 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 088401.
  • 2Fang J, Huang H, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Hao W, Huang W and Jiang W 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 088402 (in Chinese).
  • 3Foster J, Edmiston G, Thomas M and Neuber A 2008 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79 114701.
  • 4Zhou Q and Dong Z 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 015201 (in Chinese).
  • 5Deng Y and Xiao D 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 035101.
  • 6Liu X, Song Y and Wang Y 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 065205.
  • 7Cai L and Wang J 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 025217 (in Chinese).
  • 8Foster J, Krompholz H and Neuber A 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 013502.
  • 9Kim J, Kuo P and Kossey P 1995 J. Plasma Phys. 53 253.
  • 10Zhao P, Liao C and Lin W 2011 J. Electromagn. Wave. Appl. 25 2365.

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部