期刊文献+

再灌注治疗策略对ST段抬高急性心肌梗死患者预后的影响 被引量:10

Effects of different reperfusion strategies on clinical outcome of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察ST段抬高急性心肌梗死(STEMI)患者再灌注治疗策略对STEMI患者预后的影响。方法选取2012年2月至2012年12月到河南科技大学第一附属医院就诊的STEMI患者238例,根据目前PCI诊疗指南和患者的意愿,分为PCI组、单纯溶栓治疗组或药物治疗组,了解本地区STEMI的诊疗现状,比较不同再灌注策略对STEMI患者预后的影响。结果 (1)所有入选患者,随访6个月PCI组死亡9例(4.3%),单纯溶栓组死亡2例(14.3%),药物治疗组死亡2例(14.3%);在行溶栓治疗的35例患者中,溶栓+PCI组21例中死亡1例(4.8%),与单纯溶栓组14例中死亡2例(14.3%)比较,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);D2B时间中位数110 min。(2)BMS组支架内晚期血栓形成的发生高于DES组,差异有统计学意义(2.8%比0,P<0.05),但两组主要不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义(7.5%比6.9%,P>0.05)。(3)PCI组脑卒中发生率显著高于单纯溶栓组和药物治疗组(1.0%比0,P<0.05;1.0%比0,P<0.05);(4)PCI组出血发生率显著高于单纯溶栓组和药物治疗组(1.0%比0,P<0.05;1.0%比0,P<0.05)。结论多数STEMI患者选择PCI;但D2B时间较长,D2B<90 min比例较低;与单纯溶栓和药物保守治疗相比,PCI更能改善STEMI患者的预后。 Objective To evaluate the outcome of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients received different reperfusion therapies. Methods The 238 consecutive STEMI patients were enrolled from February 2012 to December 2012. According to the current guideline of PCI and the choice of patients, the patients were divided into the groups of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ifbrinolysis, and conservative medication. The major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was analyzed in a follow up of 6 months. Results (1) The enrolled patients included the 210 patients received PCI (88.2%), 14 patients received fibrinolysis (5.9%) and 14 patients received conservative medication (5.9%).The Median time of D2B was 110minutes.(2) The rate of late stent thrombosis was signiifcant higher in BMS than DES (n=2, 2.8%vs 0, P &lt; 0.05) . (3) The PCI group had a signiifcantly higher incidence of stroke than the ifbrinolysis group and the conservative medication group (1.0%vs 0, P &lt; 0.05;1.0%vs 0, P&lt;0.05). (4) The PCI group had a signiifcantly higher incidence of bleeding compared to the thrombolysis&amp;nbsp;group and the medication group (1.0% vs 0, P &lt; 0.05; 1.0% vs 0%, P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions The majority of STEMI patients received PCI;The D2B time, which was required&lt;90 minutes in guideline of PCI, was found delayed in our study;Compared to ifbrinolysis and conservative medication, PCI showed better clinical outcomes of STEMI patients.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2014年第3期172-175,共4页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
基金 中国急性心肌梗死规范化救治项目
关键词 心肌梗死 药物洗脱支架 裸金属支架 危险因素 Myocardial infarction Drug-eluting stent Bare-metal stent Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1O'Gara PT,Kushner FG,Ascheim DD5 et al.2013 ACCF/AHAguideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.JAm Coll Cardiol,2013,61:e78-el40.
  • 2万方,张拓,沈玲红,卜军,宋玮,杜勇平,金叔宣,沈节艳,何奔.急性ST段抬高心肌梗死溶栓后早期介入治疗与直接介入治疗的对比研究[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2013,21(1):3-7. 被引量:34
  • 3宋莉,颜红兵,杨进刚,孙艺红,李超,胡大一.北京市急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者转诊现况调查[J].中华心血管病杂志,2010,38(5):406-410. 被引量:17
  • 4Czaraecki A,Welsh RC,Yan RT,et al.Reperfusion strategies andoutcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients inCanada:observations from the Global Registry of Acute CoronaryEvents(GRACE)and the Canadian Registry of Acute CoronaryEvents(CANRACE)..Can J Cardiol,2012,28:40-47.
  • 5De Iuca G,Dirksen MT,Spaulding C.et al.Drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents in primary angioplasty:a pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials.Arch Intern Med,2012,172:611-621.

二级参考文献34

  • 1陈韵岱,宋现涛,吕树铮,朱华刚,潘伟琦,宁尚秋,康铁朵.12小时内就诊的急性心肌梗死患者治疗现状分析[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(1):5-8. 被引量:67
  • 2中华医学会心血管病学分会.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2009,37:2-25.
  • 3Kushner FG,Hand M,Smith SC Jr,et al.2009 focused updates:ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guidelineand 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines.J Am Coll Cardiol,2009,54:2205-2241.
  • 4Van de Werf F,Bax J,Betriu A,et al.Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation:the task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology.Eur Heart J,2008,29:2909-2945.
  • 5Widimsk(y) P,Budeslnslcy T,Vortc D,et al.Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial:PRAGUE-2.Eur Heart J,2003,24:94-104.
  • 6Andersen HR,Nielsen TT,Rasmussen K,et al.A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med,2003,349:733-742.
  • 7Bonnefoy E,Lapostolle F,Leizorovicz A,et al.Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction:a randomised study.Lancet,2002,360:825-829.
  • 8Dalby M,Bouzamondo A,Lechat P,et al.Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction:a meta-analysis.Circulation,2003,108:1809-1814.
  • 9Grines CL,Westerhausen DR Jr,Grines LL,et al.A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction:the air primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction study.J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,39:1713-1719.
  • 10Widimsky P,Bilkova D,Penicka M,et al.Long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to hospitals without catheterization laboratory and randomized to immediate thrombolysis or interhospital transport for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Five years' follow-up of the PRAGUE-2 trial.Eur Heart J,2007,28:679-684.

共引文献46

同被引文献371

引证文献10

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部