期刊文献+

纳米氟磷灰石聚醚醚酮种植体骨界面的定量分析 被引量:3

Quantitative analysis of nF A/PEEK implant interfaces in Beagle dogs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过犬动物实验,检测喷砂处理螺纹柱状纳米氟磷灰石聚醚醚酮材料(nFA/PEEK)的生物相容性和成骨性能。方法:将喷砂和非喷砂nFA/PEEK各10颗,延期植入6只犬下颌前磨牙区,术后8周和12周末各随机处死3只,种植体骨标本行同步辐射扫描后,制作非脱钙种植骨组织切片,四环素荧光标记测定动态参数骨结合率(BIC)和矿化沉积率(MAR)。苦味酸品红染色测定骨的静态参数。采用SPSS18.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:同步辐射扫描8周,种植体骨床界面呈现连续接触,新生骨组织长入螺纹凹陷处;12周均基本形成骨结合,喷砂组新骨形成和成熟更快。8周末的BIC(63.34%)和MAR(1.51μm/d)均显著高于(P<0.05)未喷砂组种植体(22.97%,1.34μm/d);12周末喷砂组的BIC(75.49%)显著高于(P>0.05)未喷砂组(55.35%),但MAR(1.28μm/d对1.27μm/d)无显著差异。骨静态学参数喷砂组骨体积分数和骨小梁数量显著高于非喷砂组,但骨小梁间隔显著低于非喷砂组(P<0.05),表明喷砂组更有利于骨量的增加,但骨小梁厚度无显著差异。结论:本研究表明,喷砂处理nFA/PEEK种植体具有良好的生物相容性,与其骨床结合紧密。 PURPOSE: A new synthetic nano-fluorapatite poly-ether-ether-ketone (nFMPEEK) dental implant in screw type was developed and its biocompatibility and osseointegration ability were evaluated in Beagle dogs. METHODS: Ten sandblasted and 10 non-sandblasted nFMPEEK implants were placed in 6 adult Beagle dogs and the bilateral mandibular second and third premolar was extracted and the wounds were healed over 3 months. Three dogs were randomly chosen and executed at the end of 8th and 12th week. To evaluated bone to implant contact (BIC) and mineral apposition rate (MAR), tetracycline was intramuscularly given twice at 10th and 3rd day, before sacrifice respectively. The implants and the surrounding bone as a whole were collected and examined by synchrotron radiation tomography. Undecaleified implant and bone specimens were cut and stained by Van Gieson for a static histomorphometric analysis. The data was analyzed using SPSS18.0 software package. RESULTS: The implants were demonstrated by synchrotron radiation and connected to most of their bone beds at 8th week. Some new bones were developed into threads of screw implants, while complete osseointegration were noted at 12th week. Sandblasted implants were found to be faster matured. BIC and MAR of sandblasted group (63.34%, 1.51 μm/d) were significantly higher than that of non-sandblasted group (22.97%, 1.34 μm/d) (P〈0.05) at 8th week. BIC of sandblasted group (75.49%) was significantly higher than that of non-sandblasted (55.35%) (P〈0.05) at 12th week, while MAR was not significantly different between the 2 groups (1.28 μm/d versus 1.27 μm/d). The static parameters showed that bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and trabecular number (Tb.N) of sandblasted group were significantly higher than that of non-sandblasted group, while trabecular spacing (Tb.Sp) was significantly lower (P〈0.05);No significant difference was found in trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) between 2 groups (P〉0.05). The sandblasting group was more conductive to increase their bone mass. CONCLUSIONS: Sandblasted synthetic: polymer's biomaterial nFA/PEEK has excellent biocompatibility and osteogenic properties, which is better osseointegrated to its bone bed. It will be a promising material as dental implants in the future.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期166-171,共6页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词 纳米氟磷灰石聚醚醚酮 喷砂 骨形态计量学 Dental implants Sandblasting Histomorphometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Li X, Feng YF, Wang CT, et al. Evaluation of biological properties of electron beam melted Ti6A14V implant with biomimetic coating in vitro and in vivo [J]. PLoS One,2012,7(12): e52049.
  • 2Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants [J]. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(32): 4845-4869.
  • 3Wang H, Xu M, Zhang W, et al. Mechanical and biological characteristics of diamond-like carbon coated poly aryl-ether- ether-ketone [J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(32): 8181-8187.
  • 4Traini T, Mangano C, Sammons RL, et al. Direct laser metal sintering as a new approach to fabrication of an isoelastic functionally graded material for manufacture of porous titanium dental implants [J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(11): 1525-1533.
  • 5魏杰,马健,刘昌胜,等.含有氟磷灰石的聚醚醚酮复合材料及制备方法和应用.中国专利,CN201010223301.2[P].2010-12-01.
  • 6Jantovti S, Letasiova S, Theiszova M, et al. Comparison of murine fibroblast cell response to fluor-hydroxyapatite composite, fluorapatite and hydroxyapatite by eluate assay [J]. Acta Biol Hung, 2009, 60(1): 89-107.
  • 7Fumhashi A, Ayukawa Y, Atsuta I, et al. The difference of fibroblast behavior on titanium substrata with different surface characteristics [J]. Odontology, 2012, 100(2): 199-205.
  • 8Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at Ti02 grit-blasted c. p. titanium endosseous implants [J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27 (6): 926-936.
  • 9Portero-Muzy NR, Chavassieux PM, Mitton D, et al. Euler(strut. cavity), a new histomorphometric parameter of connectivity reflects bone strength and speed of sound in trabecular bone from human os calcis [J]. Calcif Tissue Int, 2007, 81(2): 92-98.
  • 10Soskolne WA, Cohen S, Sennerby L, et al. The effect of titanium surface roughness on the adhesion of monocytes and their secretion of TNF-alpha and PGE2 [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002, 13(1): 86-93.

共引文献3

同被引文献26

  • 1K.L. Wong,C.T. Wong,W.C. Liu,H.B. Pan,M.K. Fong,W.M. Lam,W.L. Cheung,W.M. Tang,K.Y. Chiu,K.D.K. Luk,W.W. Lu.Mechanical properties and in vitro response of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composites[J]. Biomaterials . 2009 (23)
  • 2Thomas Apeldorn,C. Keilholz,F. Wolff‐Fabris,V. Altst?dt.??Dielectric properties of highly filled thermoplastics for printed circuit boards(J)J. Appl. Polym. Sci. . 2012 (6)
  • 3Fahed Tannous,Martin Steiner,Ramez Shahin,Matthias Kern.??Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps(J)Dental Materials . 2011 (3)
  • 4Feng Deng,Wei,Guo,Xiaochen Liu,Wu.??Nano-TiO<sub>2</sub>/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies(J)International Journal of Nanomedicine . 2012 (defa)
  • 5LiZhi Di,Bin Liu,Jianjing Song,Dan Shan,De-An Yang.??Effect of chemical etching on the Cu/Ni metallization of poly (ether ether ketone)/carbon fiber composites(J)Applied Surface Science . 2010 (9)
  • 6Cheol-Min Han,Eun-Jung Lee,Hyoun-Ee Kim,Young-Hag Koh,Keung N. Kim,Yoon Ha,Sung-Uk Kuh.??The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties(J)Biomaterials . 2009 (13)
  • 7S. Stübinger,E. Preve,A. Drechsler,G. Zappini,B. von Rechenberg.??Coated versus uncoated polyetheretherketone (peek) implants: Preliminary data of an animal model in sheep(J)International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery . 2013 (10)
  • 8Gabriel L. Converse,Weimin Yue,Ryan K. Roeder.??Processing and tensile properties of hydroxyapatite-whisker-reinforced polyetheretherketone(J)Biomaterials . 2006 (6)
  • 9Hsi-Kai Tsou,Ping-Yen Hsieh,Meng-Hui Chi.Improved osteoblast compatibility of medical-grade polyetheretherketone using arc ionplated rutile/anatase titanium dioxide films for spinal implants. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A . 2012
  • 10Xu A,Liu X,Gao X,et al.Enhancement of osteogenesis on micro/nano-topographical carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite biocomposite. Materials Science and Engineering:C . 2015

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部