期刊文献+

动词和构式之间的关系--动词语义焦点 被引量:11

The Relations Between Verbs and Constructions: On Verbal Semantics
原文传递
导出
摘要 在处理结构和动词之间的关系中,构式进路有优于词汇进路的地方。但构式语法的动词语义及其与构式整合关系的描述有其不足之处。动词语义至少在两个方面的作用不可忽视。构式多义性取决于动词;小句成立与否在一定程度上取决于动词和结构语义一致性。构式进路和词汇进路一样,对动词类组准入构式(或结构)的动因还缺乏令人信服的解释。笔者则通过发掘共享语义参数来合理解释其动因。 Constructional approach has some advantage over lexical approach in treating the relation between structure and verb. Yet, it still lacks adequate description of verb meaning and its integration with construction. Two aspects of verb mean- ing cannot be neglected. First, polysemy of construction is related with different verb classes. Second, acceptability of clauses may be related with the compatibility of verb meaning and constructional meaning. Constructional approach, like lexieal ap- proach, does not offer convincing explanation to the motivation of verb classes being licensed to the constructions. The authors attempt at an adequate explanation to the motivation via shared semantic parameters.
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期1-6,共6页 Foreign Language Education
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“论元体现构式进路和词汇进路的互补研究”(编号:11BYY112)的中期成果
关键词 构式语法 词汇语义学 动词语义 认知功能模式 construction grammar lexical semantics verb meaning cognitive-functional model
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Boas,Hans C.A lexical-constructional account of the locative alterna-tion[A].In L.Carmichael,C.-H.Huang & V.Samiian(eds.).Proceedings of the 2001 Western Conference in Linguistics(Val.13)[C].2003:27-42.
  • 2Fillmore,Charles.Topics in lexical semantics [A].In R.Cole(ed.).Current Issues in Linguistic Theory [C].Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1977:76-138.
  • 3Goldberg,Adel E.Constructions:A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1995.
  • 4Langacker,Ronald W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar(Vol.1):Theoretical Prerequisites[M].Stanford,California:Stanford University Press,1957.
  • 5Levin,Beth.English Verb Classes and Alternations[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1993.
  • 6Pinker,Steven.Learnability and Cognition:The Acquisition of Argu-ment Structure[M].Cambridge,Mass.:MIT Press,1989.
  • 7程琪龙,梅文胜.使移事件及其小句[J].外语学刊,2008(3):82-88. 被引量:25

二级参考文献11

  • 1Anderson,John M.The Grammar of Case[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1971.
  • 2Chomsky,Noam.New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind[M].London:Cambridge University Press,2000.
  • 3Glenberg,A.M.and M.P.Kashak.Grounding Language in Action[J].Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,2002(3).
  • 4Goldberg,Adele.Constructions:A Construction Grammar Ap-proach to Argument Structure[M].Chicago:The Uni-versity of Chicago Press,1995.
  • 5Jackendoff,Ray.Semantic Structures[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1990.
  • 6Jackendoff,Ray.Foundations of Language:Brain,Mean-ing,Grammar,Evolution[M].New York:Oxford Uni-versity Press Inc.,2002.
  • 7Lamb,Sydney.Pathways of the Brain:The Neurocognitive Basis of Language[M].Netherlands:John Benjamins,1999.
  • 8Langacker,Ronald W.Grammar and Conceptualization[M].Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,1999.
  • 9Levin,Beth.English Verb Classes and Alternations[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1993.
  • 10Pulvermǖller,F.,Haerle,M.and Hummel,F.Walking or Talking? Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing[J].Brain and Language,2001 (78).

共引文献24

同被引文献136

引证文献11

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部