期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

娃娃脸效应:对婴儿面孔的偏好及过度泛化 被引量：20

Babyface Effect:Babyface Preference and Overgeneralization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 娃娃脸效应是指由婴儿面孔特征(或婴儿图式)所引发的普遍、进化的社会认知反应,不仅包括对婴儿面孔的偏好性反应——如优先注意、关怀和照料的冲动,还包括对于具备婴儿图式的成年人、动物甚至非生命物体的泛化性反应,即认为这些对象具有与婴儿相似的特质并对其产生相应的态度和行为。娃娃脸效应的表现、影响因素及神经机制的相关研究证明了人类对于婴儿面孔特征的偏好性反应是一种本能释放机制,并为进化心理学中的亲代投资及性别选择理论提供了佐证。娃娃脸效应的文化差异以及实践应用可能是这一领域未来研究的主要方向。 The babyface effect is a prevalent and evolutionary social-cognitive phenomenon induced by the babyface feature or baby scheme. This effect involves not only a preference to babies＇ faces including attention capture and impulsion of caregiving and feeding but also an overgeneralization effect to adults, animals and non-living things with similar babyface features. In this way any stimuli presenting baby-like stereotype can induce corresponding attitude and behaviors. Recent studies on the manifestation, mechanism and influencing factors of the babyface effect suggest that modern people＇s response to baby scheme is an innate releasing mechanism and provide evidences to evolutionary psychological theories such as parental investment and sexual selection. Future research should focus more on the cultural difference and the practical application of this effect.
作者 窦东徽 刘肖岑 张玉洁
机构地区 中央财经大学社会发展学院心理学系 中央财经大学经济心理研究所 首都师范大学教育学院
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期760-772,共13页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 北京市教育科学规划青年专项项目(CFA13121)资助
关键词 娃娃脸效应 婴儿图式 对婴儿面孔的偏好 娃娃脸过度泛化效应 babyface effect baby scheme babyface preference babyface overgeneralization effect
分类号 B844 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] B842 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献78

  • 1罗笠铢,罗禹,鞠恩霞,马文娟,李红.婴儿图式及其加工的性别差异[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(10):1471-1479. 被引量：11
  • 2Alley, T. R. (1983). Infantile head shape as an elicitor of adult protection. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 411427.
  • 3Baeken, C., De Raedt, R., Ramsey, N., Van Schuerbeek, P., Hermes, D., Bossuyt, A., & Luypaert, R. (2009). Amygdala responses to positively and negatively valeneed baby faces in healthy female volunteers: Influences of individual differences in harm avoidance. Brain Research, 1296, 94-103.
  • 4Baeken, C., Van Schuerbeek, P., De Raedt, R., Bossuyt, A., Vanderhasselt, M. A., De Mey, J., & Luypaert, R. (2010). Passively viewing negatively valenced baby faces attenuates left amygdala activity in healthy females scoring high on 'Harm Avoidance'. Neuroscience Letters, 478(2), 97-101.
  • 5Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. Neuroimage, 21(3), 1155-1166.
  • 6Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123(11), 2189-2202.
  • 7Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.
  • 8Berry, D. S., & Zebrowitz-McArthur, L. (1988). What's in a face? Facial maturity and the attribution of legal responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(1), 23-33.
  • 9Bressan, P., Bertamini, M., Nalli, A., & Zanutto, A. (2009). Men do not have a stronger preference than women for self-resemblant child faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 657-664.
  • 10Brosch, T., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2007). That baby caught my eye.., attention capture by infant faces. Emotion, 7(3), 685-689.

二级参考文献57

  • 1Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. Neuroimage, 21, 1155-1166.
  • 2Berman, P. W. (1980), Are women more responsive than men to the young? A review of developmental and situational variables. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 668-695.
  • 3Bevy, D. S., &McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal ofPersonali- and Social Psychology, 48(2), 312-323.
  • 4Bourne, V. J., & Maxwell, A. M. (2010). Examining the sex difference in lateralisation for processing facial emotion: Does biological sex or psychological gender identity matter? Neuropsychologia, 48, 1289-1294.
  • 5Bressan, E, Bertamini, M., Nalli, A., & Zanutto, A. (2009). Men do not have a stronger preference than women for self-resemblant child faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 657-664.
  • 6Brosch, T., Sander, D., Pourtois, G., & Scherer, K. R. (2008).Beyond fear: Rapid spatial orienting toward positive emotional stimuli. Psychological Science, 19, 392-370.
  • 7Brosch, T., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2007). That baby caught my eye.., attention capture by infant faces. Emotion, 7(3), 685-689.
  • 8Chin, S. F., Wade, T. J., & French, K. (2006). Race and facial attractiveness: Individual differences in perceived adoptability of children. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4(3-4), 215-229.
  • 9Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, E, Saint-Amour, D., Lepore, E, & Lassonde, M. (2010). Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 220-225.
  • 10Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (1998). The truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian view of parental love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

共引文献10

同被引文献168

引证文献20

二级引证文献57

心理科学进展
2014年 第5期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部