期刊文献+

医护人员心理应激源量表的编制 被引量:5

Development of Medical Staff Stressor Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制医护人员心理应激源量表,并检验其信效度。方法依据心理应激理论,结合访谈和开放式问卷等方法收集条目。从安徽省4所综合性医院抽取2个样本,样本1(n=286)用于项目分析和探索性因素分析,确定问卷的项目和维度;样本2(n=392人)用于进行验证性因素分析和考察问卷的信度和效度,用症状自评量表作为校标。结果量表由25个项目组成,包括责任、任务、人际3个维度;验证性因素分析得出模型拟合指数:χ2/df=2.481、RMSEA=0.057、NFI=0.902、CFI=0.968,总分与症状自评量表(SCL-90)总均分呈显著正相关(r=0.769,P<0.001);总量表和各维度的α系数分别为0.909、0.848、0.847、0.786。结论医护人员心理应激源量表具有良好的信效度,能够作为调查医护人员心理应激的有效工具。 Objective To develop Medical Staff Stressor Scale and examine its reliability and validity. Methods Item analysis, semi-structured interview and open-ended surveys were used to collect items. Two convenience samples from four general hospitals in An- hui were selected. Sample 1 (n = 286)were investigated to examine item analysis and exploraton factor analysis and decide the final items and dimensions. Sample 2 ( n = 286 ) was recruited to respond to the final questionnaire, and test the reliability and validity of the question- naire. Symptom Checklist 90 ( SCL - 90) were used to test its criterion validity. Results Medical Staff Stressor Scale consisted of 25 i- tems and was comprised of three factors:Responsibility stress, work tasks stress,interpersonal stress. The results of SEM was fit well( X2/ df =2.481 ,RMSEA =0.057,NFI =0.902,CFI =0. 968). Correlations of Medical Staff Stressor Scale with Symptom Checklist 90(SCL - 90) were 0. 769(P 〈0.001 ). The Coronach~ ct of the whole scale and the three dimensions were 0. 909,0. 848,0. 847,0. 786. Con- dusion Medical Staff Stressor Scale has good reliability and validity, and can be used to measure psychological stress.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2014年第4期518-520,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 安徽高校省级科学研究项目(编号:KJ2011Z251)
关键词 心理应激 应激源 医护人员 信度 效度 心理评估 Stress Stressor Medical staff Reliability Validity Psychological assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Lazarus R S. From psychological stress to the emotion: A history of changing outlook [ J 1. Annual Review of Psychology, 1993,44:2-19.
  • 2Hankin B L, Abramson L Y. Development of gender differences in de- pression: An elaborated cognitive vulnerability - transactional stress theory[ J]. Psychological Bulletin ,2001,11:773-796.
  • 3Lazarus R S. From psychological stress to the emotion: A history of changing outlook[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1993,44:2-19.
  • 4郭旗,肖水源.灾难后的心理应激反应和危机干预[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2010,18(9):1140-1143. 被引量:12
  • 5邓沛荣,刘燕花,宋玉芬,隋菊英,刁咏梅.青春期精神分裂症阴性症状与心理应激关系的研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2011,19(1):14-16. 被引量:7
  • 6Holmes T H, Rahe R H. The social readjustment rating scale [ J ]. Jul Psychosom Res,1967,11 (2) :213-218.
  • 7Ibrahim Y. Development of the daily hassles scale [ J ]. Eurasian Jour- nal of Educational Research ,2004,15 : 122-131.
  • 8汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].中国心理卫生杂志,1999:194-196,235-238.88-89.
  • 9何梅.大学生心理应激量表的信、效度检验[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,16(1):7-8. 被引量:6
  • 10封丹珺,石林.公务员工作压力源问卷的初步编制[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(5):297-300. 被引量:45

二级参考文献48

共引文献190

同被引文献88

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部