期刊文献+

分配,还是承认——一种复合的教育正义观 被引量:31

Distribution or Recognition:A Compound Conception of Educational Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着西方政治哲学的复兴和繁荣,分配正义几乎成为唯一被信任和推崇的正义方案。在这种背景下,教育正义也一直被分配的范式所垄断,分配范式的教育正义旨在解决教育资源的不平等占有。但在很多情况下,并非是消除不平等,而是避免源于承认期待伤害的羞辱和蔑视代表着教育正义的规范目标;不是分配平等或物品平等,而是对尊严的平等承认构成了教育正义的核心范畴。显然,由羞辱和蔑视所引发的教育不正义是分配正义所不能解决的,而必须通过承认的正义予以矫正。因此,分配的方案并不能单独完成教育的正义规范功能,教育正义的完备方案必须由分配范式和承认范式共同型构,以形成出一种复合的教育正义观。 Distributive justice has almost become the only scheme that is trusted and advocated along with the revival and bloom of the western political philosophy. In such a context, educational justice is dominated by distributive paradigm, which aims to resolve the problem of inequal distribution of educa- tional resources. However, in many cases, the goal of educational justice is not to eliminate the inequality but to avoid humiliation and despise caused by the refusal to the desire of recognition; and the core element of educational justice is not to distribute things equally but to recognize dignity equally. Obviously, educa- tional injustice caused by humiliation and despise cannot be addressed by distributive justice; it must be corrected by recognition justice. Therefore, distributive justice itself cannot fulfill education's justice func- tion. The perfect scheme of educational justice should include both distributive justice and recognition jus- tice to create a compound conception of educational justice.
作者 吕寿伟
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期27-33,共7页 Journal of Educational Studies
基金 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目"制度伦理视域下的教育行政正义研究"(项目编号:2013SJB880019)成果 江苏省教育科学"十二五"规划专项课题"改革开放以来江苏省教育制度与教育政策变迁的伦理分析"(课题批准号:C-b/2013/01/016)研究成果 江苏大学高级技术人才科研启动基金项目"制度伦理与教育制度创新"(项目编号:12JDG124)研究成果
关键词 教育正义 分配正义 分配范式 承认范式 羞辱 蔑视 educational justice distribution recognition humiliation despise
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1金生鈜.什么是正义而又正派的教育——我国教育改革的症结[J].教育研究与实验,2006(3):1-7. 被引量:32
  • 2Allen, J. (1998) "Decency and the Struggle for Recognition", Social Theory and Practice 24:449 - 69.
  • 3Barry, B. (1995) Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 4Cooke, M. (2000) "Between ‘Objectivism' and ‘ Contextualism'" : The Normative Foundations of Social Philosophy, Critical Horizon 1: 193-227.
  • 5Fraser, N. (1997) Justice lnterruptus. Critical Reflections on the ‘Post,socialist' Condition. New York, London: Routledge.
  • 6Habermas, J. (1972) Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Beacon Press.
  • 7Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 8Hegel, G. W. ( 1991 ) Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Honneth, A. (1996) The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 10Honneth, A. (2000) "Objektbeziehungstheorie und postmoderne Identitat, uber das vermeintliche Veralten der Psychoanalyse", Psyche 54: 1087- 109.

共引文献130

同被引文献287

引证文献31

二级引证文献146

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部