期刊文献+

公平与公正待遇:理解分歧与统一

Fair and Justice Treatment: Understanding Differences and Unity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公平与公正待遇是东道国政府对外国投资和投资者提供的一种待遇,与"国民待遇"和"最惠国待遇"一起构成投资待遇的主要内容。在国际仲裁案例中,由于措词笼统、抽象,公平与公正待遇的确切含义引起很大争议,成为国际投资法中热门话题之一。文章通过介绍国际上对公平与公正待遇的涵义,探讨了如何消除对公平与公正待遇解释上的差异。 Fair and justice treatment is a treatment that the host governments offer to foreign in- vestment and investors, makes up the main content of investment treatment together with "na- tional treatment" and "most favored nation treatment". In the case of international arbitration, due to the general and abstract wording, the exact meaning of fair and justice treatment has caused great controversy and become one of the hot topics in international investment law. This paper, through introducing the ses how to eliminate the differe connotation of fair and justice treatment internationally, discus- nces in interpretation of fair and justice treatment.
作者 万双龙
出处 《吉林工程技术师范学院学报》 2013年第12期1-3,共3页 Journal of Jilin Engineering Normal University
关键词 公平与公正待遇 国际仲裁 解释冲突 统一化 fair and justice treatment international arbitration interpretation of conflicts uni-fication
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献49

  • 1J. Kalieki &. S. Medeiros, Fair, Equitable and Ambiguous: What Is Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law?, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 22, 2007.
  • 2T. J. Westcott, Recent Practice on Fair and Equitabie Treatment, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 8, 2007.
  • 3International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. United Mexican States, http://ita. law. uvic. ca/documents/ThunderbirdAward. pdf, 2009- 12- 24.
  • 4Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12.
  • 5B. Choudhury, Evolution or Devoluton? Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, 2005.
  • 6C. Schreuer, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, 2005.
  • 7OECD, International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape, Chapter 3-Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law, 2005, pp. 103- 124 .
  • 8C. McLachlan QC, L. Shore, M. Weiniger & L. Mistelis, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 226-243.
  • 9R. Dolzer & C. Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 133-149.
  • 10C. F. Dugan, D. Wallace, Jr, N. Rubins & B. Sabahi, Investment- State Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 504- 531.

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部