期刊文献+

西方遇见东方——斯洛特、蒙培元情感价值体系比较

West Meets East:Comparative Study of Sentimental Value System between Michael Slote and Meng Peiyuan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在当代哲学中,中西哲学均有某种"情感的转向"。其最新进展,斯洛特是西方哲学中最重要的代表之一,而蒙培元则是中国哲学中最重要的代表。第一,他们分别从西方内部和东方外部反思西方(启蒙)理性主义哲学那种割裂情感与理性的传统,共同主张情感与理性的统一。第二,他们都站在情感价值观立场上,分别采取重新阐释哲学、构建情感价值体系的方法:斯洛特基于生活本身有价值假定,以"容生心"超越、融合、平衡启蒙理性价值;蒙培元则回归中国哲学"生生之道、生生之理—良心"的形而上传统。其中,"容生心"和"良心"作为最基本的价值"相遇",双方价值体系可相互借鉴。第三,他们将这种情感主义价值理性体系应用于社会政治领域和自然环境领域形成了各自新的情感型正义观和生态观。 In contemporary philosophy, West and Chinese Philosophy both have some kinds of "Sentimental Turn" movement, in its current development, Michael Slote is one of the most important philosophers in West and Meng Peiyuan is the leading philosopher in China. First, either from inside or outside of West, they both rethink that kinds of separating relation between Sentiment and Reason of Western philosophy tradition especially Enlightenment Rationalism, and call for the integration of those two themes. Second, they both reclaim philosophy or ethics system and reconstruct tile sentimental value system on the standpoint of sentimental value in different ways: Slote surpasses, coalesces and balances Enlightenment rational core value with receptivity , which presupposes Life itself is valuable and Meng returns to Chinese Philosophy's metaphysics tradition of "Dao/ Li of Sheng sheng and Liangxin / Ren", during these processes, receptivity "meets" Lianxing / Ren as the deepest ethical value from West and East. They also learn from each other. Third, they respectively applied their sentimental value system into spheres of social politics and nature environment, and then they both have their new sentimental view of justice and ecology.
作者 李高阳
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期124-130,共7页 Journal of Social Sciences
基金 国家留学基金(CSC)项目(项目批准号:201206320008)的阶段性成果
关键词 反思启蒙理性 浮士德 情感价值 容生心 良心 Rethink of Enlightenment Rationalism Faustian Sentimental Value Receptivity Liangxin
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献5

  • 1Hoffman, M. , 2000, Empathy and Moral Development : Implications for Caring and Justice, Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Kant, I. , 1977, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, newly revised by J. W. Ellington from Cams, Hackett Publishing Company.
  • 3Kripke, S.A. , 1980, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press.
  • 4Scanlon, T. M. , 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Harvard University Press.
  • 5Slote, M. , 2010, Moral Sentimentalism, Oxford University Press.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部