期刊文献+

学科领域交叉性及对其测度的Φ指标——以我国科学学研究领域为例 被引量:16

A New Φ Indicator for Measuring the Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Research:A Case Study in Science of Science Research in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 科学研究中的多领域交叉融合特征通常称被为领域交叉性。领域交叉性是一种由多种要素属性复合而成的复杂性质,但已有的领域交叉性指标缺乏对这些要素属性的全面考虑。在扩展Stirling多样性指标公式基础上,创建了综合各要素属性以定量刻画领域交叉性的Φ指标。通过1997—2012年我国科学学研究类(science of science research,SSR)4种代表性期刊载文的中图分类号数据,运用Φ指标分析了SSR领域交叉性的发展变化,发现总体而言近16年来我国SSR的领域交叉性日益显著。 The characteristic of the knowledge integration of multiple disciplines in scientific research is often re-ferred to as interdisciplinarity, which is a complex synthesis of several certain attributes. The existing indicators or metrics of interdisicplinarity are lack of a comprehensive consideration for all these attributes. Expanding Stirling's formula of diversity, a Φ indicator for quantitatively analyzing interdisciplinarity is proposed. Applying the Φ in-dicator to the data set consisted of Chinese Library Classification codes in the articles published on 4 representa-tive journals of science of science research (SSR) in China from 1997 to 2012, it is found that the interdisciplin-arity of Chinese SSR has been more and more significant on the whole during recent 16-year period. Process and conclusions of the research provide some references for the development of SSR, and manifest the comprehensive-ness and effectiveness of the Φ indicator to certain extent.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期3-12,共10页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
关键词 领域交叉性 平衡性 差异性 多样性 聚合性 科学学研究 interdisciplinarity balance disparity diversity cohesion science of science research
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Porter A L, Cohen A S, Roessner J D, et al. Measur- ing researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1):117-147.
  • 2Morillo F, Bordons M, G6mez I. An approach to inter- disciplinarity through bibliometric indicators[J]. Sciento- metrics, 2001,51(1):203-222.
  • 3Morillo F, Bordons M, G6mez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and re- search areas[J]. Journal of the American Society for In- formation Science and Technology, 2003,54(13): 1237-1249.
  • 4Bordons M, Zulueta M A, Romero F, et al. Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the multidisciplinary research programme[J]. Scientometrics, 1999,46(3):383-398.
  • 5Klein J T. Interdisciplinary needs: The current con- text[J]. Library Trends, 1996,45(2):134-154.
  • 6Garwin L. US universities create bridges between phys- ics and biology[J]. Nature, 1999(397):3-4.
  • 7Porter A L, Chubin D E. An indicator of cross-disci- plinary research[J]. Scientometrics, 1985,8(3/4):161-176.
  • 8Chen K H, Liang C F. Disciplinary interflow of library and information science in Taiwan[J]. Journal of Li- brary and Information Science Studies, 2004,2(2):31-55.
  • 9Brillouin L. Science and Information Theory[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1956.
  • 10Huang M H, Chang Y W ty in information science co-authorship analysis[J] A study : Using Journal o of interdisciplinari- direct citation and f Information Sci-ence, 2011,37(4):369-378.

同被引文献326

引证文献16

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部