摘要
弹劾证据作为一种重要的证人证言质证技术,本质是一种对证据可信性的攻击手段。其在不同法域的刑事司法中都发挥了重要的作用。而中国的质证,在很大程度上被控诉方的指证和审判方的认证所挤占。被告人没有充分的质证权,这对我国的证明机制和诉讼机制是非常不利的,必须进行相应的修正和改革,而弹劾证据可以比较有效地弥补这一缺陷。通过语义分析、语境解构和语用设定我们可以分别尝试回答弹劾证据是什么、弹劾证据在中国适用需要具备哪些条件、弹劾证据在中国如何发挥充分作用三个问题。
Impeachment evidence is an important witness testimony examination technology. As a kind of evidence credibility attacks,it has played an important role in many countries. But in China,the defendant don't have the right to get full cross-examination, that is bad for our proof mechanism and action mechanism,so this situation must be reformed, and the impeachment evidence can effectively make up for the defect. By semantic analysis, deconstruction and pragmatic context setting, we can try to answer the following questions: what is impeachment evidence, how to build Chinese impeachment evidence system, and how to use impeachment evidence correctly.
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2014年第2期58-66,共9页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词
弹劾证据
可信性
语义
语境
语用
impeachment of evidence
credibility
semantic
context
pragmatic.