期刊文献+

Effects of Cooperative Learning on Interactional Strategy Use in EFL Context:An Analysis of Chinese Students' Classroom Talks

小组合作学习在英语课堂中对使用互动策略的影响作用:中国学生课堂话语分析(英文)
原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper presents a study that explored the effects of cooperative learning on Chinese students' interactional strategy use in the EFL classroom. A quasi-experimental research design was adopted. The experimental class (EC) participated in cooperative learning for 30 minutes in each 90-minute session in an integrated skills course while the control class (CC) had the same course following a teacher-fronted format. Interactional data of EC and CC were collected for comparison from the pre- and post-tasks conducted at the beginning and the end of the experiment respectively. The results show that EC appeared to have made more gains in interactional strategy use than CC after the experiment. Although CC made more progress in elaboration than EC, EC produced more uptakes, used much less Chinese and made fewer message abandonments, suggesting better oral fluency in their interaction as a result of cooperative learning. 本文是一项探讨小组合作学习在英语课堂中对中国学生使用互动策略的影响作用的实证研究。采用准实验研究方式,实验班在综合英语课每次90分钟授课里开展30分钟的小组合作学习活动,而对照班是以老师为中心的形式开展教学。通过收集实验开始及结束时实验班和对照班所进行小组活动的话语互动信息进行对比研究。结果表明,实验后实验班比对照班在使用互动策略上显得进步更大。虽然对照班比实验班在"详细论述"上进步大些,但实验班使用更多"话轮转换中的接续语",更少"转向说汉语"和"放弃表达信息",小组合作学习后的学生口语互动更流畅。
作者 林美笑
出处 《Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics》 2014年第1期49-66,129,共19页 中国应用语言学(英文)
关键词 cooperative learning interactional strategies interactive practice 小组合作学习 互动策略 语言互动
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1张文忠.国外第二语言口语流利性研究现状[J].外语教学与研究,1999,31(2):41-48. 被引量:128
  • 2Aijmer, K. 1996. Conversational Routines in English-Convention and Creativity[ MI. London:Longman.
  • 3Altenberg, B. & M. Tapper. 1998. The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners' written English [ A].In S. Granger (ed.). Learner English on Computer [ C ].London: Longman.
  • 4Arevart, S. & P. Nation. 1991. Fluency improvement in a second language [J]. RELCJournal 22/1:84-95.
  • 5Cock, S.D. et al. 1998. An automated approach to the phrasiconof EFL learners [A]. In S. Granger (ed.). Learner English on Computer [C]. London: Longman.
  • 6Hasselgren, A. 1998. Small words and Valid Testing [D].Unpublished PhD thesis, Bergen University, Norway.
  • 7Juncker, A. 1993. The discourse marker Well: A relevance theory account [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 19:435-452.
  • 8Lennon, A. 1990. Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach [J]. Language Learning 40/3: 387-417.
  • 9Schimidt, A. 1992. Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14/3:357-385.
  • 10Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部