摘要
确保安全和提升品质是现阶段世界范围内农产品的两大主题。基于现代信息科技及物联网技术的农产品追溯机制主要涉及两方面功用,一方面通过将供应链的相关信息透明化,最大程度降低生产者和消费者之间的信息不对称;另一方面通过在农产品供应链上下游实现追踪和溯源两大功能,推进农产品安全责任制,迎合了人们对农产品安全和品质的需求,引起了世界范围内的广泛重视,纷纷予以推动和实施。该文从追溯法律与法规、标准与规范、推动与实施3个层面阐述了欧美、日韩及台湾等世界主要农业发达地区农产品追溯体系的推进和最新发展情况,在列举典型追溯系统实例的基础上对比分析并总结了各自发展的特点,指出综合与精简是农产品追溯体系的发展方向,最后从机构、立法、标准、实施、验证等多个角度对中国农产品追溯体系的进一步发展、推广与深化提出建议,以期真正发挥追溯体系效用、守护国人健康。
Nowadays, agri-products production and distribution systems are becoming more and more interdependent, integrated, and globalized. The two main themes toward agri-products around the modern world include maintaining safety and improving quality. Based on the information communication technologies (ICTs) and the internet of things (IOT) technologies, traceability through the entire agri-products supply chain will effectively address safety, quality, and defense issues of agri-products by providing precise, real-time, transparent, and reliable information from the farm to the table. Traceability systems are capable of minimizing the degree of information asymmetry between producers and consumers by collecting and sharing information among all partners of the supply chain, promoting the agri-products safety responsibility by implement track and trace functions along the supply chain, and helping strengthen confidence of the customers toward agri-products. Since traceability systems are becoming an important tool for monitoring and managing agri-product flows through the supply chains, many developing and developed countries around the world put great focus on them and try to introduce traceability into various kinds of agri-products supply chains. This review described and summarized the latest progress of the agri-products traceability development in the most advanced regions of agriculture produce all over the world, which comprised three main aspects:laws and regulations, standards and norms, and promotion and implementation. 〈br〉 The agri-product traceability legal system has been developed in the Europe Union (EU), which puts "No. 178/2002 Act"at its core. It is divided into two levels:the upper level is the basic laws that set general principles, relatively; the lower level is specific articles and requirements for different kinds of agri-products based on the upper level. The EU started the Promoting European Traceability Excellence&Research (PETER) project from 2002, which was composed of a consortium of nine members coordinating nine traceability research projects, such as SEAFOODplus, FoodTrace, et al. In the United States, the “H.R. 3448 Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002”and“H.R. 2751 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act”are the two traceability acts of great importance. It started the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) in 2005, but turned to Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) and focused on the traceability for the livestock moving interstate due to high cost and the cumbersome process of NAIS in 2011. The IFT of the US had launched the Global Food Traceability Center in July 2013. It will serve as an unbiased, knowledgeable, and science-based advisor that advances insight and understanding of food traceability and focuses on eliminating the gaps in the research, development, and the need for implementation of system-wide food traceability. Canada published a new“Safe Food for Canadians Act”to strengthen food traceability in 2012 and established the Can-Trace agency to promote food traceability early in 2004. In 2013, Canada proposed the“Safe Food for Canadians Action Plan (SFCAP)” to improve the food safety system further. Japan had established a comprehensive food safety law system, but only published two traceability acts for beef and rice. The Food Marketing Research&Information Center (FMRIC) developed a number of standards and guidelines for several kinds of agri-products, such as beef, pork, fish, chicken, fruit, and vegetables. Japan promotes agri-product traceability with the audit and certification system to ensure the authenticity and integrity of traceability information. The traceability laws in Korea include:the “Food Safety Basic Act”, the “Food Sanity Act”, the “High Quality Agri-product Bill”, the “Agri-product Quality Control Act” and the “Cow and Beef Traceability Act”. The Korea Rural Development Administration (RDA) began a series of pilot traceability projects from 2004, and promoted agricultural traceability in large scale in 2006. Today, several representative traceability system are running well in Korea, such as cattle, pig, fish, et al. Taiwan started agri-product traceability in 2004 and published the“Agricultural Production and Certification Act”to develop food traceability formally in 2007. Based on amendments of several traceability laws and standards, Taiwan launched “The Project of Traceability Cloud Application on Safe Food” to integrate small traceability systems into one system in November 2013. 〈br〉 Conclusions can be drawn based on the above mentioned review:Improvement of the legal system and constantly retroactive amendments and improvements; Development of detailed traceability standards and specifications;Combination of mandatory or voluntary certification (verification) mechanism; Establishment of full-time regulatory agencies at the national level;Combination of mandatory promotion at the national level and voluntary establishment at industry level;Development of information system integration and refinement of trace items are the development trends. China could draw lessons from these systems from the world’s most advanced regions of agriculture produce in agri-product traceability developments, and it will promote the more advanced agri-product traceability system for ourselves.
出处
《农业工程学报》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第8期236-250,共15页
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金
"十二五"国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2011BAD20B12)
关键词
农产品
标准
信息系统
追溯
法律
实施
agricultural products
standards
information systems
traceability
law
implement