期刊文献+

大学教学发展中心的效益评估--以密歇根大学学习与教学研究中心为例 被引量:11

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Teaching Centers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 评估大学教学发展中心的工作效果有助于高等教育质量的改善。本文首先对教师发展工作的相关研究做了文献述评,随后介绍了密歇根大学学习与教学研究中心开发的项目综合评估模型,并结合具体的项目与服务案例展示了该中心如何记录并评估教师的教学发展工作以及如何借助这些评估结果来改善自身实践。文章最后为中国大学教学中心的建设提供了一些建议。 Evaluating the effectiveness of teaching centers is crucial to improving the quality of higher education.This article begins with a review of the literature on the evaluation of faculty development work.It then introduces the comprehensive evaluation model of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching(CRLT) at the University of Michigan.Next,the article describes how CRLT,combining specific programs and services,documents and evaluates its instructional development work,and then uses these results to refine its practice.It concludes with recommendations for those working in Chinese teaching centers.
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期13-26,189,共14页 Peking University Education Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Bothell, T. W. , & Henderson, T. (2004). Evaluating the return on investment of faculty development. In C. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds. ). To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, Vol. 22 (pp. 52-70). Bolton, MA: Anker.
  • 2Centra, J. A. (1976). Faculty development practices in U. S. colleges and universities. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • 3Chism, N. V. N., & Szab6, B. (1996). Who uses faculty development services? In 1. Richlin & D. DeZure (Eds. ). To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, Vol. 15(pp.115-128). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • 4Chism, N. V. N., & Szab6, B. (1997). Teaching awards: The problem of assessing their impact. In D. DeZure & M. Kaplan (Eds. ). To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, Vol. 16 (pp. 181-200). Stillwater, OK: New Forums.
  • 5Connolly, M. R. , & Millar, S. B. (2006). Using workshops to improve instruction in STEM courses. Metropolitan Universities Journal, 17( 4) , 53-65.
  • 6Cook, C. E. (2008). Study abroad for Chinese university presidents: How China is reforming higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40 (3) , 32-39. doi , 10. 3200/CHNG. 40. 3. 32-39.
  • 7Cook, C. E., Kaplan, M., Nidiffer, J., & Wright, M. (2001). Preparing future.
  • 8D'Eon, M., Sadownik, 1., Harrison, A., & Nation, J. (2008). Using self-assessments to detect workshop success: Do they work? American Journal of Evaluation, 29 ( 1 ) , 92- 98. doi: 10.1177/1098214007312630.
  • 9Eble, K. E., & McKeachie, W. J. (1985). Improving undergraduate education through faculty development. San Francisco: Jessey-Bass.
  • 10Ferren, A. , & Mussell, K. (1987). Strengthening faculty development programs through evaluation. In J. Kurfiss (Ed. ). To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, Vol. 6 (pp. 133-143). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

同被引文献59

  • 1汤智.地方本科院校如何构建教师教学发展体系——基于教师教学发展中心的行动研究[J].中国高等教育评论,2020(2):97-110. 被引量:2
  • 2周光礼,叶必丰.“学术权力”与“行政权力”之争的行政法透视[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),2004,57(4):459-464. 被引量:21
  • 3王英杰.大学学术权力和行政权力冲突解析——一个文化的视角[J].北京大学教育评论,2007,5(1):55-65. 被引量:146
  • 4教育部.2014年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2015/07-30/7437057.shtml.
  • 5地方高校教师教学发展中心建设初探,http://www.xz_bu.com/7/view-4269132.htm.
  • 6试论我国高校教师教学发展机制建设的动因与对策,ht-tp://www.xzbu.com/9/view-3847188.htm..
  • 7教育部财政部关于“十二五”期间实施“高等学校教学质量与教学改革工程”的意见.教高[2011]6号文.
  • 8吉林大学教师教学发展中心演示文稿,http://wenku.baidu.com/link?url=IzQhbW9JBOHkIbVrAnM6yd5e6HWlIcx43xFQq8uwlTHjNf_bfNFWTYqSIKQvMrYg08WQkkacUtoyW∞zYibnbhhdXslq0--Ialvj8ms7m13.
  • 9BOYER E L. Scholarship Reconsidered Priorities of the Professoriate[R]. New Jersey: Princeton Universi- ty Press, 1990 . 15-25.
  • 10教育部财政部关于“f二儿”期间实施“高等学校本科教学质量与教学改革工程”的意见[EB/OL].http://www. moe. gov. cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/ moe/s5667201107/ xxgk_122688, html.

引证文献11

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部