期刊文献+

巨噬细胞RAW264.7不同转染方法的比较 被引量:7

Comparative Study of the Transfection Efficiency of Macrophage by Different Methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:采用不同的转染方法介导siRNA片段转染小鼠巨噬细胞,对不同细胞转染方法进行比较。方法:分别采用脂质体转染、罗氏转染试剂转染、电穿孔法和慢病毒介导siRNA片段转染小鼠巨噬细胞,然后通过流式细胞仪分析不同转染方法的转染效率,并测定对细胞活性的影响以及目的基因的表达水平。结果:慢病毒介导siRNA转染小鼠巨噬细胞效率最高,可达34.75±5.30%,且RNA干扰效果最好;其次为罗氏转染试剂转染和电穿孔法,但电穿孔法细胞活力最低;脂质体转染效率最低,仅为12.17±1.53%,但细胞活力最好。结论:通过对4种小鼠巨噬细胞转染方法的比较,明确了4种转染方法的优缺点,为小鼠巨噬细胞转染提供了实验依据。 Objective: To transfect siRNA into murine macrophage by different methods, and comparison of different transfection methods. Method :The cells were transfected by different methods with lipofectamine, Roche transfection reagent, electroporation and lentiviral vectors, The analysis of transfection efficiency of different methods by flow cytometer, levels of target mRNA and cell viability were determined. Result: The efficiency of Lentivirus - mediated siRNA transfection is the highest, up to 34. 75 ±5. 30%, and the RNAi effect is best;Followed by Roche transfection reagent and electroporation, but electroporation cell viability lowest;Lipofectamine dif- ficult to transfected, only 12. 17 ± 1.53%, but cell viability of Lipofectamine was greatest. Conclusion: Through the comparison of the four kinds of murine macrophage transfection methods, the advantages and disadvantages of four kinds of transfection methods was ac- quired, and provides the basis for murine macrophage transfection.
出处 《生物技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期44-48,共5页 Biotechnology
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAI05B05) 国际科技合作项目(S2013ZR0176)资助
关键词 小鼠巨噬细胞 慢病毒 转染效率 细胞活力 Murine macrophage Lentiviral Transfection efficiency Cell viability
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献87

  • 1李进,洪光祥,王发斌,陈江海.Lipofectamine介导转染神经干细胞的研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(3):357-358. 被引量:7
  • 2Przybyla B,Gurley C,Harvey J F,et al.Aging alters macrophage in human properties skeletsl muscle both at rest and in response to acute resistance exercise[J].Experimental Gerontology,2006,41(3):320-327.
  • 3Pavlin M,Miklavcic D.Effective conductivity of a suspension of per-meabilized cells:a theoretical analysis[J].Biophys,2003,85:719-729.
  • 4Niidome T,Huang L.Gene therapy progress and prospects:nonviral vectors[J].Gene Therapy,2002,9:1647-1652.
  • 5Hui S W.Effects of puse length and strength on electroporation efficiency methods[J].Molecular Biology,1995,55:29-40.
  • 6Tekie W,Astumian R D,CHOCK P B.Sleective and asym-metric molecular transport across electroprorated cell membrance[J].Porc Natl Acad Sci USA,1994,91:115.
  • 7VAN D H,OFF MJ B,Christoffe LS V M,et al.Electrotrans fection with "intracellular" buffer[J].Methods in Molecular Biology,1995,48:185297.
  • 8Akashi H,Miyagishi M,Taira K.RNAi expression vector in plant cells[J].Methods Mol Biol,2004,252:533-543.
  • 9Miao Y,Jiang L.Transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in protoplasts of suspension cultured cells[J].Nat Protoc,2007(2):2348-2353.
  • 10Acha N P, Szyfres B. Zoonoses and communicable diseases common to man and animals, third ed., vol. 1. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Washington D C,2003.

共引文献141

同被引文献74

  • 1雷虹,曹雪涛,于益芝,章卫平,周正芳.重组腺病毒介导IFN-γ基因转染的巨噬细胞的体外免疫效应功能分析[J].中国免疫学杂志,1997,13(3):131-134. 被引量:12
  • 2Covert J, Mathison AJ, Eskra L, et al. Brucella rnelitensis, B. neotomae and B. ovis elicit common and distinctive macrophagc defense transcriptional responses[J]. Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 2009, 234(12): 1450-67.
  • 3O'Callaghan D. Novel replication profiles of Brucella in human trophoblasts give insights into the pathogenesis of infectious abor tion[J]. J Infect Dis, 2013, 207(7): 1034-6.
  • 4Wehinger A, Tancevski I, Schgoer W, et al. Phospholipid trans fer protein augments apoptosis in THP-1 derived macrophages in duced by lipolyzed hypertriglyceridemic plasma[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2007, 27(4):908-15.
  • 5Wu P, Ye D, Zhang D, et al. Dual effect of 3, 4-dihydroxyaceto- phenone on LPS-induced apoptosis in RAW264.7 cells by modula- ting the production of TNF-alpha[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Tech nolog Med Sci, 2005, 25(2) : 131-4.
  • 6Pei J, Kahl McDonagh M, Ficht TA. Brucella dissociation is es- sential for macrophage egress and bacterial dissemination [J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2014, 4(1): 23.
  • 7Eskra L, Covert J, Glasner J, et al. Differential expression of i ron acquisition genes by I3rucella melitensis and Brucella canis during macrophage infection [ J ]. PLoS One, 2012, 7 ( 3 ) : e31747.
  • 8Baldwin CL, Jiang X, Fernandes DM. Macrophage control of Brucella abortus : influence of cytokines and iron[J]. Trends Mi- erobiol, 1993, 1(3): 99-104.
  • 9Martirosyan A, Moreno E, Gorvel JP. An evolutionary strate gy for a stealthy interacellular Brucella pathogen[J]. Immunol Rev, 2011, 240(1): 211-34.
  • 10Liu G, Wang T, Wang T, et al. Effects of atoptosis-related proteins caspase-3, Bax and Bcl-2 on cerebral ischemia rats[J]. Biomed Rep, 2013, 1(6): 861-7.

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部