期刊文献+

体验哲学视域下的隐喻和转喻界面研究 被引量:23

A Study of the Interface between Metaphor and Metonymy from the Perspective of Embodied Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以体验哲学为视域对隐喻和转喻进行认知分析,考察二者的区别性特征、其界面的实质及其连续体关系。研究发现:1)体验哲学视域下人类具有主客观相互作用的思维方式,因此存在认知相对性;2)隐喻和转喻的认知视角和认知范畴因认知相对性而发生改变,隐喻和转喻也因此会发生相应的相互转化,二者由此产生隐转喻界面;3)在认知相对性的作用下,隐喻和转喻之间因存在界面而产生连续体关系。 This paper,from the perspective of embodied philosophy,makes a cognitive analysis of metaphor and metonymy,and respectively explores their distinctive features,interface and continuum.The following three points are what have been observed in this article:(1)In embodied philosophy,human′s thinking mode is the interaction of subjectivity and objectivity,that is why human′s cognition is relative in nature;(2)The relativity of cognition can cause the change of the cognitive perspective and cognitive category of metaphor and metonymy,which drives the mutual transformation between metaphor and metonymy.Such transformation can lead to the formation of the interface between metaphor and metonymy;(3)Influenced by the relativity of cognition,the interface can develop the continuum between metaphor and metonymy.
机构地区 宁波大学
出处 《外语研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期1-6,112,共6页 Foreign Languages Research
关键词 隐喻 转喻 界面 连续体 体验哲学 Metaphor metonymy interface continuum embodied philosophy relativity of cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Barnden, J. 2010. Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery [J]. Cognitive linguistics 21:1 - 34.
  • 2Deignan, A. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics [M].Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 3Dirven, R. & M. Verspoor. 1998. Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics [M]. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
  • 4Geeraerts, D. 2002. The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions [C] // René Dirven & Ralf Pǒrings.Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/ New York: Moulton de Gruyter: 435 -465.
  • 5Goossens,L. 2002.Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action [C]// René Dirven & Ralf Pǒrings.Metaphor and Metonym y in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/ New York: Mouhon de Gruyter: 349 - 377.
  • 6Grady, J. 1997. Theories are buildings revisited [J]. Cognitive linguistics 8:267 - 290.
  • 7Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought [M].New York: Basic Books.
  • 8Niemer, S. 2000. Straight from the heart-metonymic and metaphoric explorations [C] // A. Barcelona. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/ New York: Moulton de Gruyter: 195 - 213.
  • 9Radden,G.2002.How metonymic are metaphors? [C] // René Dirven & Ralf Pǒrings. Metaphor and Metonym y in Comparison and Contrast.Berlin/ New York: Moulton de Gruyter: 407 -434.
  • 10Taylor, J. 1995.Linguistic Categorization [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

二级参考文献89

共引文献476

同被引文献276

引证文献23

二级引证文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部