期刊文献+

Gap formation in a self-gravitating disk and the associated migration of the embedded giant planet

Gap formation in a self-gravitating disk and the associated migration of the embedded giant planet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 We present the results of our recent study on the interactions between a giant planet and a self-gravitating gas disk. We investigate how the disk's self-gravity affects the gap formation process and the migration of the giant planet. Two series of 1-D and 2-D hydrodynamic simulations are performed. We select several surface densities and focus on the gravitationally stable region. To obtain more reliable gravity torques exerted on the planet, a refined treatment of the disk's gravity is adopted in the vicinity of the planet. Our results indicate that the net effect of the disk's self- gravity on the gap formation process depends on the surface density of the disk. We notice that there are two critical values, ∑I and ∑n. When the surface density of the disk is lower than the first one,∑0 〈 ∑I, the effect of self-gravity suppresses the formation of a gap. When ∑0 〉 ∑I, the self-gravity of the gas tends to benefit the gap formation process and enlarges the width/depth of the gap. According to our 1-D and 2-D simulations, we estimate the first critical surface density to be ∑I ≈ 0.8 MMSN. This effect increases until the surface density reaches the second critical value ∑n- When ∑0 〉 ∑n, the gravitational turbulence in the disk becomes dominant and the gap formation process is suppressed again. Our 2-D simulations show that this critical surface density is around 3.5 MMSN. We also study the associated orbital evolution of a giant planet. Under the effect of the disk's self-gravity, the migration rate of the giant planet increases when the disk is dominated by gravitational turbulence. We show that the migration timescale correlates with the effective viscosity and can be up to 104 yr. We present the results of our recent study on the interactions between a giant planet and a self-gravitating gas disk. We investigate how the disk's self-gravity affects the gap formation process and the migration of the giant planet. Two series of 1-D and 2-D hydrodynamic simulations are performed. We select several surface densities and focus on the gravitationally stable region. To obtain more reliable gravity torques exerted on the planet, a refined treatment of the disk's gravity is adopted in the vicinity of the planet. Our results indicate that the net effect of the disk's self- gravity on the gap formation process depends on the surface density of the disk. We notice that there are two critical values, ∑I and ∑n. When the surface density of the disk is lower than the first one,∑0 〈 ∑I, the effect of self-gravity suppresses the formation of a gap. When ∑0 〉 ∑I, the self-gravity of the gas tends to benefit the gap formation process and enlarges the width/depth of the gap. According to our 1-D and 2-D simulations, we estimate the first critical surface density to be ∑I ≈ 0.8 MMSN. This effect increases until the surface density reaches the second critical value ∑n- When ∑0 〉 ∑n, the gravitational turbulence in the disk becomes dominant and the gap formation process is suppressed again. Our 2-D simulations show that this critical surface density is around 3.5 MMSN. We also study the associated orbital evolution of a giant planet. Under the effect of the disk's self-gravity, the migration rate of the giant planet increases when the disk is dominated by gravitational turbulence. We show that the migration timescale correlates with the effective viscosity and can be up to 104 yr.
出处 《Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第4期433-455,共23页 天文和天体物理学研究(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
关键词 planets and satellites: formation -- planetary systems: formation --planetary systems: protoplanetary disks planets and satellites: formation -- planetary systems: formation --planetary systems: protoplanetary disks
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Baruteau, c., Meru, E, & Paardekooper, S.-J. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1971.
  • 2Bell, K. R., & Lin, D. N. C. 1994, ApJ, 427, 987.
  • 3Bitsch, B., & Kley, W. 2010, A&A, 523, A30.
  • 4D' Angelo, G., K1ey, w., & Henning, T. 2003, ApJ, 586, 540.
  • 5Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Veras, D., Ford, E. B., & Beichman, C. A. 2009, ApJ, 707, 79.
  • 6Gammie, C. E 2001, ApJ, 553,174.
  • 7Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1979, ApJ, 233, 857.
  • 8Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1980, ApJ, 241,425.
  • 9Hayashi, C. 1981, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 70,35.
  • 10Hubeny, I. 1990, ApJ, 351, 632.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部