期刊文献+

语言加工机制之争

Debate on Language Processing Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信息加工机制主要有两种范式:符号主义范式和联结主义范式。这两种范式在过去20多年中以英语过去式的习得与产出为素材,对语言活动的加工机制进行了激烈争论。介绍了争论双方提出的英语过去式的产出和习得机制;从规则与类比之争、过度规则化机制之争以及渐变与突变之争3个方面分析、梳理了两者之间的争论;回顾了联结主义范式对过去式习得过程的网络模拟研究以及受到的批评;并在此基础上指出,虽然目前的研究结果与联结主义较为相符,但现有的联结主义范式还存在一定的局限性。 There are mainly two information processing paradigms: symbolist paradigm and connec- tionist paradigm. These two paradigms have debated heatedly with each other over the nature of lan- guage processing mechanism in the last twenty-plus years through the investigation of the acquisition and production of English past tense. This article described the processing mechanisms of English past development debate, and reviewed the simulation studies conducted by connectionist networks and the criticisms they received. Based on the review and analysis above, this article further pointed out that although study results so far were more congruent with the connectionist paradigm, the connectionist paradigm in its current formation still had limitations.
作者 邓劲雷
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2014年第4期104-110,146,共8页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金 福建省教育厅A类社会科学研究项目(JA10109S)
关键词 英语过去式 联结主义 符号主义 规则 类比 English past tense connectionism symbolism rule analogy
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1.CHILDES语据库.http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/,.
  • 2Rumelhart D E,McClelland J L.On learning the past tense of English verbs[C]//McClelland J L,Rumelhart D E,the PDP Rearch Group.Parallel Distributed Processing:Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition.Psychological and Biological Models.Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press,1986.
  • 3Pinker S,Prince A.On language and connectionism:Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of langauge acquisition[J].Cognition,1988,28:73-193.
  • 4沈家煊.人工智能中的“联结主义”和语法理论[J].外国语,2004,27(3):2-10. 被引量:44
  • 5顾曰国.当代语言学的波形发展主题三:语言、媒介载体与技术[J].当代语言学,2011,13(1):22-48. 被引量:17
  • 6Marcus G F,Pinker S,Ullman M,et al.Overregularization in language acquisition[J].Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,1992,57(4):Ⅲ-165.
  • 7Pinker S.Words and Rules:The Ingredients of Language[M].New York:Basic Books,1999.
  • 8Pinker,S.,M.T.Ullman.The past and future of the past tense[J].Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2002(6):456-463.
  • 9Williams E.On the notions "lexically related" and "head of a word"[J].Linguistic Inquiry,1981(12):245-274.
  • 10李平.语言习得的联结主义模式[J].当代语言学,2002,4(3):164-175. 被引量:71

二级参考文献153

共引文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部