论矿业权流转的法律冲突与协调

Conflicts between Legal Provisions on Transfer of Mining Rights and Proposed Solutions

2007年《物权法》的出台,使矿业权的私权属性更强,同时也使矿业权流转相关规定在《物权法》与《矿产资源法》、《矿业权出让转让管理暂行规定》等法律法规出现矛盾,如矿业权流转方式及类型规定的不一致、矿业权抵押制度规定出现法阶差异。如何协调这一冲突?本文参考澳大利亚、美国、加拿大等国家先进的流转方式、标准化建设制度和抵押制度,提出在《物权法》视角下应健全矿业权流转市场、规范矿业权流转方式和建立矿业权抵押制度。

The Property Law, which was issued in 2007, lays more emphasis on the private property of mining rights, but regarding the transfer of the rights, its provisions are inconsistent with those in other laws like the Mineral Resources Law and Temporary Mining Rights Trading Regulations, in terms of approaches, categorizations, and mortgage. This paper borrows insights from practices of such advanced countries as Australia, the U.S. and Canada, and proposes solutions to the problem in mining rights transfer, that is, within the framework of the Property Law, better regulating the market; monitoring the procedures; and establishing a mortgage system.