期刊文献+

电梯安全风险评价研究进展 被引量:12

Study on Elevator Safety Risk Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着社会对电梯安全需求的不断提高、新技术的发展和应用、国际贸易日益扩大,电梯的安全问题呈现出新的特点。本文介绍了电梯安全风险的国内外研究现状,通过对电梯安全风险评价程序和评价数据库建立的论述,指出了当前电梯风险评价的问题和发展趋势,为开展电梯的安全评价方法深入研究提供一定借鉴。 Elevator is a vehicle closely related to people's daily life , yet sometimes it incurs safety problems , which may cause great losses to people's life and property in the situation of mismanagement . Nowadays the society is demanding stricter safety requirements on elevator system . New technologies are being developed and applied to elevator system . As a result , there are some new concerns with elevator's safety . The paper introduces the current research situation of elevator safety risk at home and abroad , and elaborates the establishment of the procedure and evaluation of elevator safety risk assessment database . The problems and the development trend of the current elevator risk assessment are pointed out . The paper can provide a reference for further study on safety evaluation method for elevator .
出处 《现代制造技术与装备》 2014年第2期16-18,共3页 Modern Manufacturing Technology and Equipment
关键词 电梯安全 风险评价 发展趋势 elevator safety risk evaluation development trend
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献27

  • 1吴宗之.安全生产是中国可持续发展的重要组成部分[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(9):3-6. 被引量:15
  • 2任建国.安全评价操作实务讲座(一) 安全评价的起源及发展[J].劳动保护,2005(4):38-39. 被引量:2
  • 3胡容,黄南京.基于多层次灰色理论的综合评价模型及应用[J].四川大学学报(自然科学版),2005,42(5):889-895. 被引量:48
  • 4门智峰,张彦朝.特种设备的风险评估技术[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2006,2(1):92-94. 被引量:30
  • 5ZHANG G M, CAI L, ZHU W, et al. Application of evaluation model based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in elevator selection[J]. Elevator World, 2006, 54(10): 114- 119.
  • 6SAATY T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • 7KWONG C K, BAI H. A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment[J]. Journal oflntelligent Manufacturing, 2002, 13(5): 367 - 377.
  • 8ZAHEDI F. The analytic hierarchy process: a survey of the method and its applications[J], Interfaces, 1986, 16(4): 96 - 108.
  • 9BELTON V, PICTER J. A framework for group decision using a MCDA model: sharing aggregating or comparing individual information[J]. Journal of Decision Systems, 1986, 6(3): 283 - 303.
  • 10US.Department of Defense.Military Standard,System safety program for systems and associated subsystems and equipment,MIL-STD~82,1969.

共引文献387

同被引文献54

引证文献12

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部