摘要
目的比较临床医护人员使用传统的肥皂、洗手液、无水洗手液三种洗手用品洗手的效果。方法分别对三种洗手用品的效果进行细菌学监测并作统计学分析。结果肥皂、洗手液、无水洗手液洗手后平均菌数分别为10.1cfu/cm2、8.3cfu/cm2和3.6cfu/cm2。结论无水洗手液洗手效果优于传统的肥皂和洗手液,且方便、快速、高效,值得临床广泛推广。
Objective To compare the hand-washing effects of traditional soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer used by clinical medical workers. Methods The effects of three hand-washing products received bacteriological monitoring and statistical analysis. Results The average bacterial counts of soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer were 10.1cfu/cm^2, 8.3cfu/cm^2 and 3.6cfu/cm^2. Conclusion The hand-washing effect of waterless hand sanitizer is better than that of traditional soap and hand sanitizer, and it＇s convenient, fast and highly effective, thereby worthy of wide clinical promotion.
出处
《中国医药科学》
2014年第5期139-141,共3页
China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词
肥皂
洗手液
无水洗手液
洗手效果
细菌学监测
Soap
Hand sanitizer
Waterless hand sanitizer
Hand-washing effect
Bacteriological monitoring
