期刊文献+

Effects of wind input and wave dissipation formulations on the steady Ekman current solution

Effects of wind input and wave dissipation formulations on the steady Ekman current solution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The effects of different wind input and wave dissipation formulations on the steady Ekman current solution are described. Two formulations are considered: one from the wave modeling(WAM) program proposed by Hasselmann and Komen and the other provided by Tsagareli and Babanin. The solution adopted for our study was presented by Song for the wave-modifi ed Ekman current model that included the Stokes drift, wind input, and wave dissipation with eddy viscosity increasing linearly with depth. Using the Combi spectrum with tail effects, the solutions are calculated using two formulations for wind input and wave dissipation, and compared. Differences in the results are not negligible. Furthermore, the solution presented by Song and Xu for the eddy viscosity formulated using the K-Profi le Parameterization scheme under wind input and wave dissipation given by Tsagareli and Babanin is compared with that obtained for a depth-dependent eddy viscosity. The solutions are further compared with the available well-known observational data. The result indicates that the Tsagareli and Babanin scheme is more suitable for use in the model when capillary waves are included, and the solution calculated using the K-Profi le Parameterization scheme agrees best with observations. The effects of different wind input and wave dissipation formulations on the steady Ekman current solution are described. Two formulations are considered: one from the wave modeling (WAM) program proposed by Hasselmann and Komen and the other provided by Tsagareli and Babanin. The solution adopted for our study was presented by Song for the wave-modified Ekman current model that included the Stokes drift, wind input, and wave dissipation with eddy viscosity increasing linearly with depth. Using the Combi spectrum with tail effects, the solutions are calculated using two formulations for wind input and wave dissipation, and compared. Differences in the results are not negligible. Furthermore, the solution presented by Song and Xu for the eddy viscosity formulated using the K-Profile Parameterization scheme under wind input and wave dissipation given by Tsagareli and Babanin is compared with that obtained for a depth-dependent eddy viscosity. The solutions are further compared with the available well-known observational data. The result indicates that the Tsagareli and Babanin scheme is more suitable for use in the model when capillary waves are included, and the solution calculated using the K-Profile Parameterization scheme agrees best with observations.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第3期709-719,共11页 中国海洋湖沼学报(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41176016) the National Basic Research Program of China(973 Program)(Nos.2012CB417402,2011CB403501) the Fund for Creative Research Groups by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41121064)
关键词 输入 消浪 配方 稳定 参数化方案 观测数据 涡粘性 WAM Combi spectrum Stokes drift wind input wave dissipation steady Ekman current solution
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Babanin A V, Soloviev Y P. 1998. Variability of directional spectra of wind-generated waves, studied by means of wave staff arrays. Mar. Freshwater Res., 49(2): 89-101.
  • 2Babanin A V, Tsagareli K N, Young I R, Walker D J. 2010. Numerical investigation of spectral evolution of wind waves. Part II: dissipation term and evolution tests. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40(4): 667-683.
  • 3Babanin A V, Young I R. 2005. Two-phase behaviour of the spectral dissipation of wind waves. Proc. Fifth Int. Symp. Ocean Waves Measurement and Analysis, Madrid, Spain, ASCE. p.51.
  • 4Banner M L, Peirson W L. 1998. Tangential stress beneath wind-driven air-water interface. J. Fluid Mech., 364(1): 115-145.
  • 5Booij N, Holthuijsen L H, Ris R C. 1996. The SWAN wave model for shallow water. Proc. 25th Int. Conf. in Coastal Eng., ASCE, Orlando, FL, ASCE. p.668-676.
  • 6Donelan M A, Babanin A V, Young I R, Banner M L. 2006. Wave-follower field measurements of the wind-input spectral function. Part II: Parameterization of the wind input. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36(8): 1 672-1 688.
  • 7Donelan M A, Hamilton J, Hui W H. 1985. Directional spectra of wind-generated waves. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A, 315(1534): 509-562.
  • 8Guan C L, Xie L. 2004. On the linear parameterization of drag coefficient over sea surface. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34(12): 2847-2851.
  • 9Hasselmann K et al. 1973. Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Dtsch. Hydrogr. z., A8(Suppl.): 1-95.
  • 10Hasselmann S et al. 1988. The WAM model-a third generation ocean wave prediction model. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 18(12): 1 775-1 810.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部