摘要
课程评价突出表现为以选拔与淘汰为价值取向的考试评价,作为分数的符号之所以大行其道,是因为分数符号具有诸多的交换价值。课程评价能以符号代替真实,其根源在于课程评价的表征要求,而质性评价主观性强,在国家层面上是无法操作的,所以课程评价最终以分数符号居于主导地位。课程评价是一种价值判断,反映了分数符号与社会的交换,分数符号代表课程的社会功能实现程度。分数符号不是简单的符号,它是有价值的,它凝结着学习者学习时间的累积,对学生来说,分数在一定意义上是时间累积的等价交换。分数符号与教学也有交换,评价与教学是一个矛盾的两个方面,忽视评价的教学就是在否定课程目标,当教学没有目标时,教学也就不存在了。
Curriculum evaluation is mainly represented by examination evaluation, highlighting the value orientation of selection and elimination, for the score symbol has quite a few exchanging value. The real cause of symbol replacing reality resides in the representation requirement of curriculum evaluation, while qualitative assessment is subjective to a large extent, and therefore is hard to operate at the level of the whole nation. Curriculum evaluation is a kind of value judgment, reflecting the exchange between score symbol, which stands for curriculum's social functions, and society. Also, score symbol and teaching exchange with each other. Evaluation and teaching are the two sides of the same contradiction, and teaching neglecting evaluation means denying the curriculum goal, teaching without any goal indicating non-existence of teaching itself.
出处
《江苏教育研究》
2014年第4期3-7,共5页
Jiangsu Education Research
关键词
课程评价
分数符号
交换价值
curriculum evaluation
score symbol
exchange value