期刊文献+

将WOMAC和整体健康状况评价量表结合引入股骨头坏死保髋疗法结局评价的设想 被引量:4

Proposal on Bringing WOMAS and Holistic Health Evaluation Scale into Outcome Evaluation of Hip Protection Therapy for ANFH
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股骨头坏死是骨伤科疑难病之一,选择适当的评价手段来评价其治疗方法显得非常重要。基于医生报告股骨头坏死保髋疗法结局评价方法有一定局限性;为适应现代生物-心理-社会医学模式,广大医学工作者提出了患者自我报告结局估量(Patient Reported Outcome Measures,PROMS)。PROMS要求尽量选择症状等主要的自我报告结局指标,以增强量表的敏感性,但是量表的选择应该是互相补充的,末梢自我报告结局指标如综合评价生理、心理、健康相关的生存质量也应当作为评价指标;通过量表的筛选,我们建议将WOMAC和整体健康状况评价的量表结合评价股骨头坏死保髋结局。 Avascular necrosis of the Femoral Head(ANFH) is one of tough orthopedic diseases, and finding appropriate tools to evalu- ate their treatment are very important. Outcome evaluations of hip protection therapy for ANFH based ondoctor reports have some limita- tions. In order to adapt to modern biological - psychological - social medical model, medical workers proposed the patient reported out- come measures (PROMS). In order to enhance the sensitivity of the scale, primary PROMS such as symptoms were asked to include in- to the scale. However, the selected scales should be complementary, so distal self-reported outcome measures such as comprehensive e- valuation of physical and psychological health, health-related quality of life also should be used as an evaluation index; through scale screening, we propose to combine the overall health and WOMAC scale to evaluate outcome of ONFH.
出处 《世界中医药》 CAS 2014年第4期517-519,共3页 World Chinese Medicine
基金 武警学院青年教师基金资助项目(编号:QNJS201318)
关键词 股骨头坏死 患者自我报告结局估量 评价 Avascular necrosis of the femoral head Patient reported outcome measures Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Schmitt - Sody, Kirchhoff C, Mayer W, et al. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head : inter - andintraobserver variations of Ficat and ARCO clas- sifications[J]. Int Orthop,2008,32(3) :283 -7.
  • 2Lynne C. Outcome Measures for Evaluation of Treatments for Osteonecro- sis[ J]. Orthop Clin N Am,2009, (40) : 179 - 191.
  • 3Huffman, Synovial fluid metabolites in osteonecrosis [ J ]. Rheumatology, 2007,46:523 - 528.
  • 4Takao M,Sugano N, Nishii T, etal. Longitudinal quantitative evaluation of lesion size change in femoral head osteonecrosis using three - dimen- sional magnetic resonance imaging and image registration [ J ]. J Orthop Res,2006,24(6) :1231 -9.
  • 5Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life : assessment, analysis and interpreta- tion [ M ]. New York : John Wiley dr Sons, Ltd ; 2007.
  • 6Dennis Revicki, Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient - reported outcomes [ J ]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2008, (61) : 102 - 109.
  • 7Higginson, etal. Measuring quality of life : Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting[ J]. British Medical Journal,2001:1297 - 1300.
  • 8Jacqui Wise, NHS publishes data on patient reported health outcomes [J]. BMJ,2010, (341) :5143.
  • 9John F. Scoggins, The use of patient - reported outcomes instruments in registered clinical trials : Evidence from ClinicalTrials. gov, Contemporary Clinical Trials,2009, (30) :289 - 292.
  • 10Hawkes N. How do we get the measure of patient care[ J]. BMJ,2008, (2) :336.

同被引文献81

引证文献4

二级引证文献268

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部