期刊文献+

CapeOx与FOLFOX4方案治疗大肠癌的临床观察 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察比较CapeOx方案与FOLFOX4方案治疗进展期大肠癌术后辅助治疗的毒副反应。方法对218例符合纳入标准的III期及以上大肠癌患者,115例接受CapeOx方案化疗,103例接受FOLFOX4方案化疗,主要观察指标为不良反应及患者满意度。结果 CapeOx组手足综合征的发生率(47.8%)明显高于FOLFOX4组(22.3%),但反应较轻,多为I-II度;FOLFOX4组中性粒细胞减少的发生率(71.8%)明显高于CapeOx组(49.6%),同时,CapeOx组血小板减少的发生率(43.5%)明显高于FOLFOX4组,且调查结果显示CapeOx方案满意度更高。结论 CapeOx方案比FOLFOX4方案更安全、简便,耐受性好。
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2014年第2期253-254,共2页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1李立,汪晓东,舒晔,于永扬,王存,王自强,王天才,周总光.四川大学华西医院·结直肠癌手术治疗指南(一)[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2008,15(10):778-778. 被引量:26
  • 2Cuppone F, Bria E, Sperduti I, et al. Capecitabine (CAP) versus 5-fluorouracil (FU) in combination with oxaliplatin(OX) as lst-line chemotherapy(CT) for advanced colorectal cancer(ARAC):meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT)[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26,abstr 4056.
  • 3Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al, Randomized phase m study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouraeil/folinie acid plus oxali- platin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26: 2006-2012.
  • 4Schmoll HJ, Cartwright T, Tabernero J, et al. Phase II trial of capecitabine plus ox- aliplatin as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon caner: a planned safety analysis in 864 patients [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007;25: 102-109.
  • 5Ducreux M, Bennouna J, Herbbar M, et al.Efficacy and safety findings from a ran- domized phaseⅢ study of capecitabine(X) +oxaliplatin (O) (XELOX) vs. infusional 5- FU/LV +O (FOLFOX6) for metastatic col- orectal cancer (MCRC)[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 : 18S4029.
  • 6Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, et al. Com- parison of oral capecitabine versus intra- venous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as frist-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: resuhs of a randomized phase Ⅲstudy [J]. J Clin On- col, 2001, 19: 2282-2292.

共引文献25

同被引文献21

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部