期刊文献+

Supreme喉罩联合Coopdech支气管阻塞器用于食道癌根治术患者气道管理效果 被引量:7

Effiacy of Coopdech bronchial blocker combined with a laryngeal mask airway Supreme for airway management in patients undergoing esophageal carcinoma resection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价Supreme喉罩联合Coopdech支气管阻塞器用于食道癌根治术患者气道管理的可行性和效果。方法采用随机数字表法将择期全麻下行经胸食道癌根治术患者60例,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级I~Ⅲ级,年龄65岁~78岁,随机分为3组(每组20例):双腔支气管插管组(DT组),Coopdech支气管阻塞器组(TC组)和Supreme喉罩联合Coopdech支气管阻塞器(sc组)。记录一次插管成功率及插管和定位时间;观察术中导管移位、需行纤维支气管镜检查例数和评价术中肺萎陷的情况;术后24h咽喉疼痛及声音嘶哑和术后肺不张的发生例数;观察麻醉前(T0),插管即刻(T1),插管后1(T2)、3(T3)、5min(T4)的血流动力学和脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS)变化;记录双肺通气10min(T5),单肺通气(one lung ventilation,OLV)10(T6)、30(T7)、60min(TR)时气道压(airway pressure,Paw)和呼气末二氧化碳分压(end tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure,PETCO2)。结果与DT组比较,TC组和SC组的插管和定位时间明显短于DT组(P〈0.05),TC组和sc组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);与T1时刻比较,在T2-4时刻,DT组和Tc组收缩压(systolic pressure,SP)、舒张压(diastolic pressure,DP)、心率(heart rate,HR)及BIS明显升高(P〈0.05),SC组BP、DP、HR和BIS无明显变化(P〉0.05);与DT组比较,SC组和TC组T2-4时刻BP、DP、HR和BIS明显降低(P〈0.05);术中OLV(T6-8)时,DT组气道压力明显高于sc组(P〈0.05),3组间PETCO2差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);术中导管移位、需行纤维支气管镜检查例数、肺萎陷程度差异、术后肺不张发生率3组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);sc组术后24h咽喉疼痛、声音嘶哑(20%)发生率,明显低于DT组(85%)和TC组(45%)(P〈0.05或P〈0.01)。结论Supreme喉罩联合Coopdech支气管阻塞器可安全用于食道癌根治术患者气道管理。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Coopdech bronchial blocker combined with a laryngeal mask airway Supreme for airway management in patients undergoing esophageal carinoma resection. Methods Sixty patients undegoing esophageal carcinoma resection were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20): double-lumen tube group (group DT), Coopdecb bronchial blocker combined with single-lumen tube group (group TC) and Coopdeeh bronchial blocker combined with a laryngeal mask airway Supreme group (group SC ). The fiberoptic bronchoscope was used to assist endotracheal tube positioning in both groups. The first attempt success rates of intubation, the intubation time, positioning time, the number of fiberoptic bronchoscopy attempts, degree of lung collapse, postoperative atelectasis, postoperative sore throat and hoarseness were recorded. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded before anesthesia(T0),immediately after intubation(T~) and at 1, 3 rain and 5 min after intubation (T24). Airway pressure (Paw) and end tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PzrCO2) was recorded at two lung ventilation 10 min(Ts) and 10 (T6), 30(T7), 60 min(Ts) after one lung ventilation(OLV). Results Compared to group DT, The intubation time and the positioning time was significantly shorter in group TC and group SC. Compared with T~, HR, BP and BIS significantly increased in group TC and group SC group at number of patients required for tube Tz4. Compared with group group DT, there was no significant difference in SP, DP, HR, BIS, the displacement, the number of fiberoptic bronchoscopy attempts and degree of lung collapse among the three groups. Paw was significantly higher during OLV at group DT than group SC. Incidences of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness were significantly lower in group SC (20%) compared to group DT (80%) and group TC (45%). Conclusions The efficacy of the Coopdech bronchial blocker combined laryngeal mask airway Supreme is safe in patents undergoing esophageal carinoma resection.
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2014年第5期392-396,共5页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
关键词 喉面罩 支气管封堵器 呼吸 人工 Laryngeal mask Bronchial blocker Respiration, artificial
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Myojo Y,Kamiutsuri K,Taki Y,et al.Management of one lung ventilation with bronchial blocker catheter for a patient with tracheobron chopathia osteochondroplastiea[J].Masui,2007,56(2):167-168.
  • 2Timmermnnn A,Cremer S,Heuer J,et al.Laryrgeal mask LMA Supreme.Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management[J].Anaesthesist,2008,57(10):970-975.
  • 3Campos JH,Kemstine KH.A comparison of a left-sided BronchoCath with the torque control blocker univent and the wire-guided blocker[J].Anesth Analg,2003,96(1):283-289.
  • 4Campes JH.Which device should be considered the best for lung isolation:double-lumen endotracheal tube versus broachiul blockers[J].Curr Opin Anesthesiol,2007,20(1):27-31.
  • 5Uzuki M,Kanaya N,Mizuguchi A,et al.One-lung ventilation using a new bronchial blocker in patient with tracheostomy stoma[J].Anesth Analg,2003,96(5):1538-1539.
  • 6谢言虎,柴小青,高燕春,荣壮飞,陈昆洲.支气管封堵器在电视胸腔镜手术单肺通气中的应用研究[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2013,34(6):496-498. 被引量:21
  • 7孙来荣,顾连兵,邱宁雷,任斌辉,王丽君.支气管阻塞器用于胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者单肺通气的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2010,30(7):890-892. 被引量:9

二级参考文献4

  • 1Knoll H, Egeler S, Hreiber JU, et al. Airway injuries after one- lung ventilation: a comparison between double-lumen tube and endobronchial blocker.a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesthesiology, 2006, 105(3 ) : 471-477.
  • 2Abe K, Mashim O, Yoshiya I. Arterial oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation: acomparision of isoflurane and sevoflurane. Anesth Analg, 1998, 86(6): 1266.
  • 3Ho AM, Ng SK, Tsang KH, et ol. A technique that may improve the reliability of endobrochial blocker positioning during adult one- lung anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2009, 37(6): 1012-1016.
  • 4Zhong T, Wang W, Chen J, et al. Sore throat or hoarse voice with bronchial blockers or double-lumen tubes for lung isolation: a randomized prospective trial. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2009, 37 (3): 441-446.

共引文献27

同被引文献48

引证文献7

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部