摘要
图灵著名的"通用机"的属性长期以来支撑着关于认知本质的功能主义直觉。克里斯·伊利亚史密斯认为,对可多样实现性的标准的功能主义论证有一个逻辑问题。这些论证实质上都依赖于图灵对计算的强有力的洞察。在处理了对这一批评的一种可能的答复之后,克里斯·伊利亚史密斯进一步论证了功能主义不是理解什么是具有心灵的一种有效途径。特别是他证明了在区别执行和功能时所涉及的难题会使可多样实现性无法检验,难以提供新的信息。因此,可以得出结论:图灵机在心灵哲学中的作用还需重新考虑。
The properties of Turing's famous 'universal machine' have long sustained functionalist intuitions about the nature of cognition. This paper shows that there is a logical problem with standardfunctionalist arguments for multiple realizability. These arguments rely essentially on Turing's powerful insights regarding computation. In addressing a possible reply to this criticism, it is further argued that functionalism is not a useful approach for understanding what it is to have a mind. In particular, it is shown that the difficulties involved in distinguishing implementation from function make multiple realizability claims untestable and uninformative. As a result, it is concluded that the role of Turing machines in philosophy of mind needs to be reconsidered.
出处
《哲学分析》
2014年第2期118-126,共9页
Philosophical Analysis
关键词
图灵机
功能主义
可多样实现性
计算的等价
心灵哲学
柯尔莫哥洛夫
Turing machine
functionalism
multiple realizability
computational equivalence
philosophy of mind
Kolmogorov