期刊文献+

理解作为一种辩护方法的政治建构主义 被引量:2

Making Sense of Political Constructivism as a Justificatory Method
原文传递
导出
摘要 政治自由主义的公共辩护承诺以及合理多元性事实的存在,使得运用建构主义制定正义原则成为必要。罗尔斯通过阐发和改造康德的道德建构主义,发展出一种适合用来建构自立的政治性正义原则的政治建构主义;它从一些成为自由民主社会共识的实践理性的观念出发,运用体现所有实践理性相关要求的代表性设施即原初状态,公开地展示对诸种政治价值的一种有序排列并以一个(组)正义原则的方式表达出来,以求获得全体自由平等公民的接受。在此意义上,政治建构主义承担起了公共辩护的核心工作。 In Political Liberalism, the commitment to public justification and the existence of the fact of reasonable pluralism make it necessary to use constructivism to formulate principles of justice. Through interpreting and transform Kant's moral constructivism, Rawls develops a kind of political constructivism, which is suitable for constructing a self-standing political principle of justice. It starts from some fundamental conceptions of practical reason taken as a consensus in liberal democratic socie- ty, then employs a representative device namely original position which satisfy all relevant requirements of practical reason to publicly display an order of political values. This order, as the re- sult of this constructive process, is expressed in a systematic principle of justice. All the work above is done to make sure the principle of justice can obtain all free and equal citizens' reasonable approval. In this sense, political constructivism undertakes the core task of public justification.
作者 陈肖生
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期54-62,共9页 Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词 政治建构主义 正义原则 公共辩护 实践理性 罗尔斯 political construetivism principle of justice public justification practical reason Rawls
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1John Rawls. PoZitical Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
  • 2John Rawls. Collected Papers, ed. by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
  • 3Sharer-Landau. Moral Realism = A Defence. Oxford= Clarendon, Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • 4Immanuel Kant. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Immanuel Kant : Practical Philosophy. Cambridge.- Cam- bridge University, 1996.
  • 5Ronald Dworkin. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA.- Harvard University Press, 1986.
  • 6John Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
  • 7Michael Walzer. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
  • 8Christine M. Korsgaard. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. Ox-Cord: Oord University Press, 2008.
  • 9Thomas Nagel. Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • 10John Rawls. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA.. Harvard University Press, 1999.

同被引文献7

  • 1Berlin I.Does political theory still exist?.Philosophy,politics and society,1962:1-33.
  • 2[美]查尔斯·蒂利:《强制、资本与欧洲国家》第3页,魏洪钟译,[上海]上海人民出版社2007年版.
  • 3The Oxford handbook of political theory.Oxford Handbooks Online,2008.
  • 4Chapter One:WEBER’S CHALLENGE TO POLITICAL THOUGHT,载Wellen R.Dilemmas in liberal democratic thought since Max Weber.P.Lang,1996.
  • 5[美]罗伯特·古丁、汉斯-迪特尔·克林格曼《:政治科学新手册》第680页,钟开斌等译,[北京]生活·读书·新知三联书店2006年版.
  • 6[美]普特南:《“意义”的意义》,载陈波、韩林合主编:《逻辑与语言:分析哲学经典文选》第523页,[北京]东方出版社2005年版.
  • 7李月军.比较历史分析视野下政治秩序的起源、变迁与终结--评福山的《政治秩序的起源》[J].国外理论动态,2013(7):111-118. 被引量:2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部