期刊文献+

胃溃疡性穿孔腹腔镜下修补术与开腹手术的临床研究 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨分析腹腔镜下胃穿孔修补术与开腹手术治疗胃溃疡性穿孔的临床疗效。方法随机选择2010年1月~2013年2月在本院普外科住院治疗的胃溃疡性穿孔患者88例,研究组48例患者行腹腔镜下胃穿孔修补术,对照组40例患者行开腹胃穿孔修补术。对比分析两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、术后肠鸣音恢复时间和肛门排气时间、住院时间、术后疼痛程度及术后并发症发生率。结果研究组患者术后肠鸣音恢复时间和肛门排气时间、住院时间均明显短于对照组;研究组患者术中出血量明显少于对照组;差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。研究组患者疼痛程度轻于对照组,镇痛剂使用率明显低于对照组(P〈0.05)。研究组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P〈0.05)。两组患者随访1年均无复发。结论腹腔镜下胃穿孔修补术治疗胃溃疡性穿孔具有术中出血量少、术后疼痛轻、恢复快、住院时间短等优点,术后并发症发生率低、术后胃肠动力恢复较快,是胃溃疡穿孔有效的、首选的术式。且手术安全可靠,适于基层医院开展。
作者 陈胜才
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2014年第7期43-44,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1李明意,缪辉来.急诊腹腔镜手术176例[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(22):2623-2625. 被引量:5
  • 2Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2004,18 ( 7 ) : 1013-1021.
  • 3Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique [ J ]. Ann Surg, 1996,224 ( 2 ) : 131-138.
  • 4Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer : a randomized controlled trial [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2002,235(3) :313-319.
  • 5Lorand I, Molinier N, Sales JP, et al. Results of laparoscopic treatment of perforated ulcers [ J ]. Chirurgie, 1999,124 ( 2 ) : 149- 153.
  • 6Tsumura H, Ichikawa T, Hiyama E, et al. Laparoscopic and open approach in perforated peptic ulcer[ J ]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2004,51 (59) : 1536-1539.
  • 7Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, et al. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2004,91 (4) : 481-484.
  • 8吴阶平,裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:908-918.
  • 9Kang JY,Elders A,Majeed A,et al.Recent trends in hospital admissions and mortality rates for peptic ulcer in Scotland 1982-2002[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2006;24(1):65-79.
  • 10Kocer B,Surmeli S,Solak C,et al.Factors affecting mortality and morbid-ity in patients with peptic ulcer perforation[J].J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2007;22(4):565-70.

共引文献167

同被引文献44

  • 1黄素.腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术与开腹手术后患者康复情况的临床比较研究[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(22):82-83. 被引量:5
  • 2王忠军.腹腔镜修补术与开腹修补术治疗胃穿孔疗效对比研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2013(12):140-141.
  • 3Bertleff MJ,Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease:a review of history and treatment [ J ]. Dig Surg,2010,27 ( 3 ) : 161 - 169.
  • 4Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Ciardo LF, et al. The laparoscopic ap- proach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed?:A single-center review of a 15-year experience [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22(5) :1255 - 1262.
  • 5Bertleff M J, Lange JF. Laparoscopie correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice.'? A review of literature[ J]. Surg Endosc,2010, 24(6) :1231 - 1239.
  • 6Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer[ J ]. Br J Surg, 1990,77 ( 9 ) : 1006.
  • 7Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ,et al. Aparoscopic repair of per- forated duodenal ulcers : outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive pa- tients[J]. Arch Surg,1999,134(8) :845 -848.
  • 8Lunevicius R, Morkevieius M. Comparison of laparoseopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers [ J ]. Surg Endosc,2005, 19(12) :1565 - 1571.
  • 9Bingener J, Loomis EA, Gostout CJ,et al. Feasibility of NOTES o- mental plug repair of perforated peptic ulcers: results from a clini- cal pilot trial[ J]. Surg Endosc ,2013,27(6) :2201 - 2208.
  • 10Lam PW, Lain MC, Hui EK, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers :the " three-stitch" Graham patch technique [ J 1. Surg Endosc,2005,19 (12) : 1627 - 1630.

引证文献7

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部