期刊文献+

3种理想化滞回模型下的弹塑性反应谱对比 被引量:1

Comparative study on elastic-plastic response spectra of three idealized hysteretic models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对双线性(BIL)和剪切滑移(SSP)滞回模型的SDOF体系在地震作用下进行弹塑性动力分析,得到考虑和不考虑P-Δ效应时不同场地、延性等参数组合下双周期标准化的地震力调整系数R谱,并与理想弹塑性(EPP)滞回模型的R谱比较.结果表明:在Tga<T<TgR周期段,等能量准则在BIL模型中成立,EPP模型的R值大于等能量准则的值,显示耗能能力在此周期段中有重要影响;在T>2TgR周期段,3种滞回模型的R谱接近;P-Δ效应对BIL模型的影响可以忽略,对EPP和SSP模型的影响随延性的增大而增大;对于具有90%保证率的R谱,BIL模型在Tga<T<TgR范围内很小,SSP模型仅略有改善,EPP模型的谱值最大. Abstract: The dynamic elastic-plastic analysis of systems of bilinear elastic (BIL) model and shear-slipped elastic-plastic (SSP) model was conducted to acquire the seismic force modification factor R for different site and ductility. The R-spectra were constructed with their abscissa normalized with two characteristic periods. The R-spectra with the dynamic P-Δ effect being considered and being not included were constructed. Results were compared with those of elastic-perfectly plastic (EPP) models. Results reveal that the equal-energy rule is valid only for BIL model in the range of Tga%T%TgR. For EPP and SSP, the R spectra are greater than for BIL, indicating the importance of energy dissipation capacity in the period range of Tg.~T^TgR. With T^2Tgk, the R spectra are similar for all three models. The p-A effect has almost no influence on the R spectra of BIL model, but for EPP and SSP models, its influence increases with the ductility factor. For the R spectra with 90% assurance, the R spectra are very small for BIL model in the period of Tga〈T〈TgR, the R spectra for SSP has only minor improvement and the R spectra of EPP model has the greatest value.
出处 《浙江大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期693-703,共11页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51078328 50908203)
关键词 抗震设计 地震力调整系数 滞回模型 P-Δ效应 弹塑性动力分析 seismic design seismic force modification factor hysteretic model P-Δ effect elastic-plasticdynamic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1VEI.ETOS A S, NEWMARK N M. Effect of inelastic behavior of the response of simple systems to earthquake motion [C]//2nd World Conference of Earthquake Engineering. Berkerley: [s. n. ],1960:895 - 915.
  • 2NEWMARK N M, HALL W J. Earthquake spectra and design [M]. Berkeley: Earthquake Engineering Re search Institiute, 1982:35-36.
  • 3RIDDELL R, GARCIA J E, GARCES E. Inelastic deformation response of SDOF systems subjected to earthquake [J]. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 2002,31(3): 515- 538.
  • 4MOHAMMAD T K. Seismic shear strengthening of R/C columns with ferrocement jacket [J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2005, 27(8): 834-842.
  • 5JORGE R G, MIRANDA A E. Inelastic displacement rations for evaluation of structures built on soft soil sites [J]. Earthquake Engineering and structural Dynamics, 2006, 35(6): 679-694.
  • 6MIRANDA A E. Site-dependent strength-reduction factors [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1993, 119 (12): 3503-3519.
  • 7TIWARI A K,GUPTA K. Scaling of ductility and damage-based strength reduction factors for horizonta mo- tions [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2000,29(7) : 969 - 987.
  • 8ZHAO Y F, TONG G S. An investigation of character istic periods of seismic ground motion[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13(4) : 540 - 565.
  • 9TONG G S, ZHAO Y F. Inelastic yielding strength demand coefficient spectra [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquakes Engineering, 2008, 28(12) : 1004 - 1013.
  • 10TONG G S, ZHAO Y F. Seismic force modification factors for modified-Clough hysteretic model [J]. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29 ( 11 ) : 3053 - 3070.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部