期刊文献+

改良中文版非语言疼痛评估量表的信效度研究 被引量:13

A study on reliability and validity of Chinese version of improved nonverbal pain assessment scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]初步探讨引入改良版非语言疼痛评估量表(简体中文版)应用于存在交流障碍的ICU 病人的信效度.[方法]选取某三级甲等医院120 例入住ICU 气管插管病人,运用改良版非语言疼痛评估量表进行观察评估,用内部-致性、评定者间信度、内容效度、主成分/因子分析、校标效度、特异度与灵敏度对测试结果进行评价.[结果]量表的内部-致性良好(Cronbach’s α系数为0.781),评定者间评分差异无统计学意义.各条目与总分间相关系数为0.647~0.757;因子分析提取1个公因子,贡献率为51.823%,5个条目的因子负荷为0.642~0.809;量表评估值与病人主诉疼痛值相关系数为0.735;当量表评分≥4分时敏感度为90%,特异度为74%.[结论]改良版非语言疼痛评估量表(简体中文版)具有较好的信效度和可行性,但是否可推广应用于所有存在交流障碍的病人还需要进一步测评. Objective:To probe into the reliability and validity of introduction of modified nonverbal pain assessment scale(simplified Chinese) applied for ICU patients with communication obstacles.Methods:A total of 120cases of tracheal intubation patients were selected in ICU in a third-grade class A hospital,and the scale was applied for observation and evaluation.And the test results were evaluated with the index of internal consistency,inter rater reliability,content validity,principal component/factor analysis,criterion validity,specificity and sensitivity.Results:the internal consistency of the scale was good(Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.781),inter rater reliability was high,and correlation coefficient between each item score and total score was 0.647~0.757.Factors analysis extracted a common factor,the contribution rate was 51.823%. Five items of factor loading was 0.632~0.809.The correlation coefficient between scale assessment value and patients complained of pain value was 0.735.Its sensitivity was 90% and specificity was 74% when score of nonverbal pain assessment scale was 4or more.Conclusion: Modified nonverbal pain assessment scale(simplified Chinese)has good validity and feasibility.However,whether it can be applied for patients with communication disorders need to be evaluated further.
作者 张晶 田丽
出处 《护理研究(上旬版)》 2014年第3期800-803,共4页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
关键词 改良版非语言疼痛评估量表 疼痛 评估 信度 效度 modified version of nonverbal pain assessment scale pain as-sessment reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1谢伟萍,金三丽,王思,王欣然,韩斌如.外科重症监护病房术后行机械通气病人的疼痛强度评估方法研究[J].护理研究(中旬版),2011,25(11):2936-2937. 被引量:9
  • 2Payen JF,Bru O,Bosson JL,et al.Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale[J].Critical Care Medicine,2001,29 (12):2258-2263.
  • 3Schnakers C,Chatelle C,Demertzi A,et al.What about pain in disorders of consciousness-[J].The AAPS Journal,2012,14(3):437-444.
  • 4Merkel SI,Voepel LT,Shayevitz JR,et al.The FLACC:A behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children[J].Pediatr Nurs,1997,23 (3):293-297.
  • 5Odhner M,Wegman D,Freeland N,et al.Assessing pain control in nonverbal critically ill adults[J].Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing,2003,22 (6):260-267.
  • 6Gélinas C,Arbour C.Behavioral and physiologic indicators during a nociceptive procedure in conscious and unconscious mechanically ventilated adults:Similar or different-[J].Journal of Critical Care,2009,24(4):628.
  • 7Wegman DA.Tool for pain assessment[J].Critical Care Nurse,2005,25 (1):14-15.
  • 8Haysf RD,Anderson R,Revicki D.Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures[J].Quality of Life Research,1993,2 (6):441-449.
  • 9张立秀,刘雪琴.蒙特利尔认知评估量表中文版的信效度研究[J].护理研究(上旬版),2007,21(11):2906-2907. 被引量:321
  • 10陈卫中,倪宗瓒,潘晓平,刘元元,夏彦.用ROC曲线确定最佳临界点和可疑值范围[J].现代预防医学,2005,32(7):729-731. 被引量:208

二级参考文献46

共引文献538

同被引文献165

引证文献13

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部