期刊文献+

TG-B改性大豆蛋白/聚乙烯醇复合薄膜研究 被引量:3

The Study on Soy Protein/Polyvinyl Alcohol Composite Films Modified by TG-B
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了提高大豆蛋白/聚乙烯醇复合薄膜的综合性能,以薄膜的拉伸强度、断裂伸长率、透光率、吸水率为主要评价指标,通过引入隶属度函数综合评价薄膜性能,研究了谷氨酰胺转氨酶TG-B对大豆蛋白/聚乙烯醇复合薄膜性能的影响。试验结果表明:TG-B的添加质量分数、反应pH、成膜温度对薄膜性能的影响较大,当TG-B的添加质量分数为1.0%,反应pH值为6.0,成膜温度为50℃时,大豆蛋白/聚乙烯醇复合薄膜的综合性能最优;在此条件下,薄膜的抗张强度、断裂伸长率、透光率和吸水率分别为8.26 MPa,53.80%,16.23%和67.76%,与未添加TG-B的空白对照相比,其抗张强度、断裂伸长率、透光率分别提高了75.4%,162.9%,27.2%,吸水率降低了25.6%。 To improve the comprehensive properties of soy protein/polyvinyl alcohol films, the effects of reducingagents on the properties of the films were studied. The tensile strength, elongation, transmittance and water absorption ofthe films were compared. Furthermore, a vague mathematics model was used to evaluate the quality of the films. Theexperimental results showed that the concentration of TG-B, the reaction of pH, film-forming temperature all have greatinfluences on film properties. When the mass fraction of TG-B was 1.0%, with reaction pH of 6.0, film-forming temperatureof 50 ℃, soybean protein / PVA composite films had the best performance. In this condition, tensile strength, elongation,transmittance and water absorption of the film were 8.26 MPa, 53.80%, 16.23% and 67.76% respectively. Compared with theblank without adding TG-B, tensile strength, elongation, transmittance were increased by 75.4%, 162.9%, 27.2%, while waterabsorption of the film decreased by 25.6%.
出处 《包装学报》 2014年第1期16-21,共6页 Packaging Journal
基金 河北省科技计划基金资助项目(10225151)
关键词 TG-B 大豆蛋白 聚乙烯醇 性能 TG-B soy protein polyvinyl alcohol(PVA) property
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献124

共引文献84

同被引文献35

  • 1任红,杨洋,韦小英.超声波强化大豆分离蛋白膜性能的研究[J].现代食品科技,2006,22(2):101-103. 被引量:17
  • 2冯新星,陈建勇,张建春,郭玉海.溶胶-凝胶法制备纳米TiO_2/丝素复合膜及结构性能研究[J].化学学报,2006,64(22):2281-2286. 被引量:13
  • 3陈义勇,邓克权,王伟,赵雪.玉米醇溶蛋白膜的制备及其在保鲜中的应用[J].常熟理工学院学报,2007,21(10):74-77. 被引量:14
  • 4宋贤良,周家华,朱翠华,叶盛英,黄苇.大豆蛋白纳米二氧化钛复合膜的制备及性能研究[J].现代化工,2007,27(12):40-41. 被引量:7
  • 5Su Junfeng, Wang Xiaoyan, Huang Zhen, et al. Heat- Sealing Properties of Soy Protein Isolate/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Blend Films: Effect of the Heat-Sealing Temperature[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2010, 115: 1901- 1911.
  • 6Denavi G, Tapia-Bltcido D R, Aft en M C, et al. Effects of Drying Conditions on Some Physical Properties of Soy Protein Films[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2009, 90:. 341-349.
  • 7Lacroix M, Le T C, Quattara B, et al. Use of Irradiation to Produce Films from Whey, Case in and Soy a Proteins : Structure and Functional Characteristics[J]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2002, 63 : 827-832.
  • 8Seung Y C, Chul R. Sorption Characteristics of Soy Protein Films and Their Relation to Mechanical Properties[J]. Lebensm Wish U-Technol, 2002, 35: 151-157.
  • 9Rhim J W, Gennadios A, Handa A, et al. Solubility, Tensile, and Color Properties of Modified Soy Protein Films [J]. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry, 2002, 48: 4937-4941.
  • 10Mariniello L, Pierro P D, Esposito C, et al. Preparation and Mechanical Properties of Edible Pectin-Soy Flour Films Obtained in the Absence or Presence ef Transglutaminase [J]. JournalofBiotechnology, 2003, 102: 191-198.

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部