摘要
塞尔的言语行动论对意义的说明引起一些误解,塞尔对这些误解的澄清基本是成立的,但是论据上存有谬误之处。塞尔在前期对意义的解释存在漏洞,但后期以一种新的方式对意义的解释不但是成功的,而且解决了言语行动中的那些漏洞。
Searle’s clarification about some misunderstanding that Seale’s speech acts theory interpreting meaning causes is available, but some errors can be found in his argument. There are defects in Searle’s earlier interpretation about meaning. Nevertheless, a new model of later interpretation is successful in solving those defects.
出处
《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2014年第1期141-145,共5页
Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词
塞尔
意义
言语行动
交流
表征
Searle
meaning
speech acts
communication
representation