期刊文献+

塞尔言语行动和意义关系理论的批判

Searle's speech acts and meaning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 塞尔的言语行动论对意义的说明引起一些误解,塞尔对这些误解的澄清基本是成立的,但是论据上存有谬误之处。塞尔在前期对意义的解释存在漏洞,但后期以一种新的方式对意义的解释不但是成功的,而且解决了言语行动中的那些漏洞。 Searle’s clarification about some misunderstanding that Seale’s speech acts theory interpreting meaning causes is available, but some errors can be found in his argument. There are defects in Searle’s earlier interpretation about meaning. Nevertheless, a new model of later interpretation is successful in solving those defects.
作者 胡光远
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2014年第1期141-145,共5页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词 塞尔 意义 言语行动 交流 表征 Searle meaning speech acts communication representation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1John R. Searle. Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy oflanguage [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
  • 2R.M. Hare. The language of morals [M]. New York: OxfordUniversity Press Inc., 1952.
  • 3P. F. Strawson. Truth [J]. Analysis, 1949, 9(6): 83-97.
  • 4John R. Searle. Meaning and speech acts [J]. The PhilosophicalReview, 1962, 71(4): 423-432.
  • 5Searle, John R. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy ofmind [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 6John R. Searle. Literary theory and its discontents [J]. NewLiterary History, 1994, 25(3): 637-667.
  • 7H. P. Grice. Meaning [J]. The Philosophical Review, 1957, 66(3):377-388[8] John R. Searle. Structure and intention in language: A reply toKnapp and Michaels [J]. New literary history, 1994, 25(3):677-681.
  • 8Steven Knapp, Walter Benn Michaels. Reply to John Searle [J].New literary History, 1994, 25(3): 669-675.
  • 9John R. Searle. Meaning, communication, and Representation[C]// Richard E. Grandy, Richard Warner. Philosophical Groundsof Rationality. New York: rk: Clarendon Press, 2004.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部