期刊文献+

瘢痕疙瘩成纤维细胞低密度培养的克隆能力分析

Clonal Analysis on Low Density Culture of Keloid Fibroblasts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较瘢痕疙瘩成纤维细胞(KFs)和正常真皮成纤维细胞(NFs)间克隆形成能力的差异,探讨瘢痕疙瘩中病理性干细胞是否存在,及其对瘢痕疙瘩发生发展的影响。方法利用酶消化法获得瘢痕疙瘩和正常皮肤组织的原代细胞,以4 000个/皿的密度接种,进行低密度培养,2周后观察细胞克隆的形成及形态变化。结果低密度培养条件下的瘢痕疙瘩成纤维细胞和正常皮肤成纤维细胞都可形成克隆,但KFs可形成明显的克隆集落,NFs形成的克隆不明显且松散。KFs克隆形成率高于NFs,为(0.80±0.21)%,而NFs为(0.18±0.06)%,两者间差异显著(P<0.05)。结论低密度培养条件下,瘢痕疙瘩成纤维细胞的克隆形成能力高于正常皮肤成纤维细胞,可能与瘢痕疙瘩组织中存在病理性瘢痕疙瘩干细胞有关。 Objective To compare the clone forming capacity between keloid fibroblasts (KFs) and normal dermal fibroblasts (NFs), and to explore whether there are pathological stem cells in keloid and the role of keloid stem cells on the mechanism of keloid formation. Methods Primary cells were obtained from keloid tissue and normal dermis respectively through enzyme digestion method, and then were cultured under low-density conditions of 4 000/dish. Two weeks later, the clone formation and morphology were determined. Results Under low-density culture conditions, clones were formed in both KFs and NFs. KFs formed distinct and dense clones while NFs formed loose and fewer ones. KFs exhibited higher clone forming efficiency (CFE) of (0.80±0.21)%than NFs with CFE of (0.18±0.06)% (P〈0.05). Conclusion With low-density culture, keloid fibroblasts possess higher level of cloning capacity than normal dermal fibroblasts, which suggests pathological stem cells may exist in keloid tissues.
出处 《组织工程与重建外科杂志》 2014年第2期82-84,99,共4页 Journal of Tissue Engineering and Reconstructive Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30872694 81101432)
关键词 瘢痕疙瘩 低密度培养 克隆形成率 瘢痕疙瘩干细胞 Keloid Low-density culture Cloning formation efficiency Keloid stem cells
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Schalkwijk J, et al. On the nature of" hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1999,104(5): 1435-1458.
  • 2Kelly AP. Medical and surgical therapies for keloids [J]. Dermatol Ther,2004,17 (2):212 -218.
  • 3Guo W, Lasky JL 3rd, Wu H. Cancer stem cells [J]. Pediatr Res, 2006,59(4 Pt 2):59R-64R.
  • 4Hope K, Bhatia M. Clonal interrogation of stem cells [J]. Nat Methods,2011,8(4 Suppl):S36-S40.
  • 5Kishi T, Takao T, Fujita K, et al. Clonal proliferation of multipotentstem/progenitor cells in the neonatal and adult salivary glands [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun,2006,340(2):5d4-552.
  • 6Miller RH, Szigeti V. Clonal analysis of astrocyte diversity in neonatal rat spinal cord cultures [J]. Development,1991,113(1): 353-362.
  • 7Cao X, Gu Y, Jiang L, et al. A new approach to screening cancer stem cells from the U251 human glioma cell line based on cell growth state [J]. Oncol Rep,2013,29(3):1013-1018.
  • 8Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, et al. International clinical recommendations on scar management [J]. Plast Reeonstr Surg, 2002,110(2):560-571.
  • 9Vincent AS, Phan TT, Mukhopadhyay A, et al. Human skin keloid fibroblasts display bioenergeties of cancer cells [J]. J Invest Dermatol,2008,128(3) :702-709.
  • 10Satish L, Lyons-Weiler J, Hebda PA, et al. Gene expression patterns in isolated keloid flbroblasts [J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2006,14(4) :463 -470.

二级参考文献41

共引文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部