期刊文献+

美国对专利海盗的规范措施及我国的借鉴 被引量:9

Regulation on Patent Trolls in United States and the Reference for China
原文传递
导出
摘要 由于近年来专利海盗对美国经济以及企业的技术研发和生产经营所产生的影响正在扩大,学术界的分析和研究、行政主管部门的调查和国会立法都在展开。美国政府也发布了关于专利海盗的研究报告并公布了一系列行政措施和立法建议,提出了包括惩罚滥用诉讼、披露权利人信息、提高审查标准以及改进行政执法等多项措施以遏制专利海盗。借鉴美国针对专利海盗的各类最新调查与规范,我国也应当通过提高专利质量、限制恶意诉讼以及加强反垄断执法等措施防范和限制专利海盗。 In recent years, the influence of patent trolls on American economy and enter- prise's technology research and management is expanding. A series of academic analysis, ad- ministrative investigations and Congress legislation are launched. The White House issued several executive actions and legislative proposals and released a report about patent trolls. It is proposed that punishing the abuse of litigation, disclosing information of patent holder, enhancing the re- view standard, improving the administrative enforcement and other measures to limit patent trolls. By introducing and analyzing various surveys and specification on patent trolls in America, we al- so should limit and regulate this problem in China. It is suggested that enhancing the standard of patent, improving anti - monopoly enforcement, limiting malicious litigation and other measures.
作者 吕磊
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期132-140,共9页 Law Science Magazine
关键词 专利海盗 非实施主体 专利主张主体 patent trolls NPE PAE
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1贺宁馨,袁晓东.专利钓饵对中国专利制度的挑战及其防范措施研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(1):12-19. 被引量:15
  • 2《谷歌请求美政府对专利流氓采取强硬姿态》,http://net.chinabyte.corn/409/12585409.shtml,访问日期:2013年12月20日.
  • 3《白宫采取重要措施打击“专利流氓”》,http://www.ipr.gov.cn/guojiiprarticle/guojiipr/guobiehj/gbhjnews/201306/1758474-1.html,访问日期:2013年12月10日.
  • 4"Scratching my Head Over the SHIELD Act", http ://cpip. gmu. edu/2013/03/13/scratching - my - head - over - the一shield-act/,访问日期:2013年12月25日.

二级参考文献21

  • 1鲁灿,詹锐.从eBay案看美国专利保护趋势——兼论我国专利“停止侵权”责任方式[J].电子知识产权,2006(9):48-52. 被引量:16
  • 2Hagiu A,Yoffie D,Wagonfeld A D. Intellectual Ventures[Harvard Business Strategy Unit:HBS Case No.710-423][R].2009.
  • 3Jensen P H,Palangkaraya A,Webster E. Disharmony in intemational patent office decision[J].The Federal Circuit Bar Journal,2006,(04):679-704.
  • 4Ailison J R,Lemley M. The growing complexity of the united states patent system[J].HeinOnline-B U L Rew,2002,(82):77-135.
  • 5Fischer T,Henkel J. Patent Trolls on Markets for Technology:An Empirical Analysis of Trolls' Patent Acquisitions[R].Technische Universit(a)t München,SSRN,2011.
  • 6Shapiro C. Injunction,hold-up,and patent royalties[J].American Economic Review,2010,(02):509-557.
  • 7Schaerr G C,Loshin J R. Doing Battle with 'Patent Trolls' Lessons from the Litigation Front Lines[R].Winstin Strawn LLP,2011.
  • 8Shapiro C,Lemley M A. Patent holdup and royalty stacking[J].Texas Law Review,2007,(85):1991-2049.
  • 9allGregory J K. The troll next door[J].The John Marsh Review of Intellectual Property Law,2007,(292):6-7.
  • 10Reitzig M,Henkel J,Heath C. On sharks,trolls,and their patent prey:Unrealistic damage awards and firms' strategy of 'being infringed[J].Research Policy,2007,(36):134-154.

共引文献14

同被引文献61

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部