期刊文献+

关于疼痛的外显和内隐性别角色期望研究(英文) 被引量:1

Implicit and Explicit Gender Role Expectations of Pain among College Students in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察中国人关于疼痛的外显和内隐性别角色期望特征。方法:名健康大学生作为研究对象,其中女性48人,男性44人,分别通过关于疼痛的性别角色期望问卷和外部情绪性Simon任务测量其关于疼痛的外显和内隐性别角色期望。结果:在外显态度测量中,无论是女性还是男性被试均认为,相对于男性,女性的疼痛临界点更低、疼痛耐受力更低、表达疼痛倾向更高。在内隐态度测量中,男性与高疼痛耐受力或低疼痛敏感性的内隐联结在男性和女性被试的测量结果中均体现出来,但是,女性与低疼痛耐受力或高疼痛敏感性的内隐联结仅仅在男性被试的测量结果中体现出来,女性被试的测量结果中没有表现出相应的内隐联结。结论:研究证实了中国女性关于疼痛的外显和内隐女性性别角色期望存在分离的现象。 Objective: Gender role expectations of pain(GREP) are reflected by individuals' attitudes towards sex differ- ences in pain perception. The aim of the present study was to examine the feature of the Chinese implicit and explicit gen- der role attitudes of pain. Methods: Explicit and implicit attitudes of 92 Chinese undergraduates to social expectations in pain were investigated using GREP questionnaire and the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task(EAST). Results: The results of GREP investigation were congruent with Robinson, Riley III and Myers(2001). Both male and female participants agreed ex- plicitly that typical woman have a lower pain threshold, lower pain tolerance and higher willingness to report pain than typi- cal man. In EAST test, there was a significant association between men and low frequency of pain reports in both male and female participants. Interestingly, the association between women and high frequency of pain reports was only found among male participants. No such effect was found among female participants. Conclusion: The results suggested that there was dissociation between explicit and implicit GREP toward women among female participants. The results of implicit attitude measurement may provide a more specific GREP towards men and women.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期202-209,共8页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(13YJC190003) 中国民用航空飞行学院面上项目(JZ2012-21) 中国民用航空飞行学院科研基金重点项目(JZ2009-07)
关键词 关于疼痛的性别角色期望 疼痛敏感性 疼痛耐受力 外部情绪性Simon任务 Gender role expectations of pain Sensitivity to pain Endurance of pain Extrinsic affective simon task
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Robinson ME, Riley III JL, Myers CD. Gender role expecta- tions of pain: Relationship to sex differences in pain. The Journal of Pain, 2001, 2:251-257.
  • 2Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain, 1996, 65:123-167.
  • 3Defrin R, Shramm L, Eli I. Gender role expectations of pain is associated with pain tolerance limit but not with pain threshold. Pain, 2009, 145:230-236.
  • 4Pool GJ, Schwegler AF, Theodore BR. Role of gender norms and group identification on hypothetical and experimental pain tolerance. Pain, 2007, 129:122-129.
  • 5Bargh JA, Chartrand TL. The unbearable automaticity of be- ing. American Psychologist, 1999, 54:462-479.
  • 6Back MD, Schmukle SC, Egloff B. Predicting actual behav- ior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 97: 533- 548.
  • 7Dijksterhuis A, Nordgren LF. A theory of unconscious thou- ght. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2006, 1:95-109.
  • 8Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. Implicit social cognition: Attitu- des, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1995, 102:4-27.
  • 9Wilson TD, Lindsey S, Schooler TY. A model of dual attitu- des. Psychological Review, 2000, 107:101-126.
  • 10Robinson ME, Wise EA. Gender bias in the observation of experimental pain. Pain, 2003, 104:259-264.

二级参考文献35

  • 1张镇,李幼穗.内隐与外显自尊情境启动效应的研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(3):318-320. 被引量:15
  • 2佐斌,张阳阳,赵菊,王娟.刻板印象内容模型:理论假设及研究[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(1):138-145. 被引量:89
  • 3杨福义.内隐自尊的理论与实验研究.华东师范大学.2006.
  • 4Watson LA, Dritschel B, Obonsawin MC, Jentzsch I. Seeing yourself in a positive light: Brain correlates of the self-pos- itivity bias. Brain Research, 2007, 1152:106-110.
  • 5Wilson TD, Lindsey S, Schoolcr TY. A model of dual atti- tudes. Psychological Review, 2000, 107:101-126.
  • 6Mezulis AH, Abramson LY, Hyde JS, Hankin BL. Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differenc- es in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bul- letin, 2004, 5:711-747.
  • 7Watson LA, Dritschel B, Jentzsch I, Obonsawin MC. Chang- es in the relationship between self-reference and emotional valence as a function of dysphoria. British Journal of Psy- chology, 2008, 99:143-152.
  • 8Yang WH, Zhu XZ, Wang X, et al. Time course of affective processing bias in major depression: An ERP study. Neuro- science Letters, 2011, 487:372-377.
  • 9Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwarz JLK. Measuring indi-vidual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit associ- ation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74:1464-1450.
  • 10White KR, Crites SL, Taylor JH, Corral G. Wait, what? As- sessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP com- ponent. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2009, 4(2): 191-198.

共引文献5

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部