期刊文献+

学习自我调节量表中文版的信、效度初步检验 被引量:4

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Academic Self-regulation Questionnaire
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:引入Ryan等人编制的学习自我调节量表(SRQ-A),并在中小学生群体中对其信效度进行检验。方法:选取上海市4-8年级中小学生525名,通过项目分析、验证性因素分析等方法检验量表的项目鉴别力和结构效度,选用基本心理需求量表(BPNS)、学校态度量表(SAS)和学习成绩为效标,考察量表的效标关联效度;对55名中学生间隔两周重测,评定量表的重测信度。结果:①学习自我调节量表项目鉴别力良好,各题目与所属分量表的相关在0.49-0.79之间;②验证性因素分析结果表明,修订后的学习自我调节量表结构效度较好,χ2/df=3.41,RMSEA=0.07,NFI=0.95,NNFI=0.95,GFI=0.86,CFI=0.96,IFI=0.96,各项目的因子载荷在0.39-0.92之间;③学习自我调节量表总分与基本心理需求满足、学校态度和学习成绩呈显著正相关,相关系数在0.13-0.41之间;④总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.92,各分量表的Cronbachα系数在0.72-0.89之间;⑤总量表的重测信度为0.74,各分量表的重测信度在0.65-0.76之间。结论:修订后的学习自我调节量表在中国文化背景下表现出较好的信效度。 Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire(SRQ-A) in primary and junior high school students. Methods: A sample of 525 students from the 4th to 8th grade was administrated with the SRQ-A, Basic Psychological Needs Scale(BPNS) and School Attitude Scale(SAS). Aca- demic achievement was obtained for all participants from the school records; a sample of 55 junior high school students was retested two weeks later. Results: (1)Item analysis showed that the SRQ-A had satisfactory item discrimination(r〉0.49); (2) Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the whole scale had a four-order factor constructure and good constructure validi- ty(x2/df=3.41, RMSEA=0.07, NFI=0.95, NNFI=0.95, GFI=0.86, CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96), the range of factor loading was be- tween 0.39 and 0.92; (3)The SRQ-A was significantly and positively correlated with BPNS and SAS, with the correlation co- efficients ranged from 0.13 to 0.41; (4)The Cronbach' s alpha coefficients were 0.92 for the total scale, and 0.72 to 0.89 for the four subscales, respectively; (5)The test-retest reliability coefficients were 0.74 for the total scale, and 0.65 to 0.76 for the four subscales, respectively. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the SRQ-A is a reliable and valid instrument.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期256-259,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31300855) 上海市曙光计划项目(12SG38) 上海市教育委员会科研创新重点项目(14ZS112)
关键词 学习动机 信度 效度 验证性因素分析 心理测量学 Academic motivation Reliability Validity Confirmatory factor analysis Psychometric
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and serf-determin- ation in human behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.
  • 2Ryan RM, Deci EL. Serf-determination theory and the facil- itation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well- being. American Psychologist, 2000, 55(1): 68-78.
  • 3Ryan RM, Deci EL. Approaching and avoiding self-determ- ination: comparing cybernetic and organismic paradigms of motivation. In Carver C, Scheier M. Perspectives on behav- ioral self-regulation: Advances in social cognition. Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers,1999, 7: 193- 215.
  • 4Deci El, Vallerand R J, Pelletier LG, Ryan RM. Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educa- tional Psychologist, 1991, 26(3): 325-346.
  • 5Ryan RM, Connell JP. Perceived locus of causality and inte- rnalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57(5): 749-761.
  • 6Gillet N, Vallerand R J, Lafreni~re MAK. Intrinsic and extr- insic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 2012, 15(1): 77-95.
  • 7Munster Halvari AE, Halvari H, Bjcrnebekk G, Deci EL. Motivation and anxiety for dental treatment: Testing a self- determination theory model of oral self-care behaviour and dental clinic attendance. Motivation and Emotion, 2010, 34 (1): 15-33.
  • 8Legauh L, Green-Demers I, Pelletier LG. Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic motivation and social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2006, 98(3): 567-582.
  • 9张剑,张微,宋亚辉.自我决定理论的发展及研究进展评述[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2011,27(4):131-137. 被引量:44
  • 10王燕,郑雪.自我决定研究述评[J].黑龙江教育学院学报,2008,27(1):80-82. 被引量:7

二级参考文献88

  • 1刘旺.小学生自尊与生活满意度的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(11):745-749. 被引量:12
  • 2任俊,叶浩生.当代积极心理学运动存在的几个问题[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(5):787-794. 被引量:97
  • 3蔡春凤,周宗奎.童年中期同伴关系、同伴关系知觉与心理行为适应的关系[J].心理科学,2006,29(5):1086-1090. 被引量:15
  • 4谭千保,陈宇.班级环境对初中生学校适应的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(1):51-52. 被引量:27
  • 5Watson D, Clark LA. On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their rela- tion to the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and So- cial Psychology, 1992, 60:441-476.
  • 6Diener E, Diener C. Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 1996, 7:151-185.
  • 7Berry DS, Hansen JS. Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psych- ology, 1996, 71:796-809.
  • 8Suh E, Diener E, Fujita F. Events and subjective well- being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 70:1091-1102.
  • 9Diener E, Emmons RA. The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo- gy, 1984, 47:1105-1117.
  • 10Berry D, Willingham J, Thayer C. Affect and personality as predictors of conflict and closeness in young adults' friend- ship. Journal of Research in Personality, 2000, 34:84-107.

共引文献144

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部