期刊文献+

重症急性胰腺炎新分型对病情评估的临床价值研究 被引量:1

Clinical value study on the new classification of severe acute pancreatitis to the condition assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)新分型对病情评估的临床价值。方法 回顾性分析2008年6月-2013年6月124例确诊为SAP的患者的临床资料,其中符合中度重症急性胰腺炎(MSAP)诊断定义的有83例.符合SAP诊断定义的有41例。分析两组患者的急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数(BISAP)评分,统计住院死亡率、总住院天数、ICU监护需要率、ICU监护天数、有创支持治疗需要率等方面的差异。结果 MSAP组和SAP组患者中,BISAP评分〈3分的患者分别为79例(95.2%)和3例(7.3%),BISAP评分≥3分的患者分别为4例(4.8%)和38例(92.7%),BISAP评分分别为(1.4±0.2)分和(3.2±0.7)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);MSAP组和SAP组的住院死亡率(1.2%vs46.3%)、总住院天数(14.6±3.7vs30.4±6.3)、ICU监护需要率(18.1%vs80.5%)、ICU监护天数(3.0±0.8vs17.4±3.9)、有创支持治疗需要率(30.1%vs87.8%)差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论 SAP新分型有助于病情评估,并能早期准确识别危重症患者,减少不必要的医疗资源浪费,减轻患者的心理及经济负担。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of the new classification of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to the condition assessment.Methods 124 cases of patients diagnosed as SAP in our hospital from June 2008 to June 2013 were studied retrospectively.According to the new classification of SAP,83 cases were moderately severe acute pancreatit (MSAP),41 cases were SAP.The severe acute pancreatitis bedside index (BISAP) score was analyzed,the in-hospital mortality,total hospital stay,need for ICU care,duration of ICU stay,need for invasive treatment were compared between two groups.Results In MSAP group and SAP group,BISAP score〈3 were 79 cases (95.2%) and 3 cases (7.3%) respectively,while BISAP score≥〉3 were 4 cases (4.8%) and 38 cases (92.7%) respectively,the BISAP score were 14.6±3.7 vs 30.4±6.3,there was significant difference between two groups (P〈0.01).The MSAP group and SAP group of in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs 46.3%),total hospital stay (14.6±3.7 vs 30.4±6.3),need for ICU care (18.1% vs 80.5%),duration of ICU stay (3.0±0.8 vs 17.4±3.9),need for invasive treatment (30.1% vs 87.8%) had significant difference (P〈0.01).Conclusion The new classification of SAP is helpful to the condition assessment,can early and accurately diagnose the critically ill patients,reduce the unnecessary waste of medical resources,reduce the psychological and economic burden of patients.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2014年第13期159-161,共3页 China Modern Medicine
基金 河南省开封市2014年科技发展计划(1403011)
关键词 重症急性胰腺炎 新分型 回顾性研究 BISAP评分 Severe acute pancreatitis The new classification Retrospective study Severe acute pancreatitis bedside index score
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1刘岩,路筝,李兆申,董元航,张文俊,潘雪.APACHEⅡ、Ranson和CT评分系统对重症急性胰腺炎预后评价的比较[J].胰腺病学,2006,6(4):196-200. 被引量:39
  • 2邹晓平,顾超,刘明东,李运红,钱铖.三种临床评分标准对急性胰腺炎预后的评估价值比较[J].中华消化杂志,2007,27(1):32-35. 被引量:27
  • 3Ekrem Kaya,Adem Dervi■o■lu,Cafer Polat.Evaluation of diagnostic findings and scoring systems in outcome prediction in acute pancreatitis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2007,13(22):3090-3094. 被引量:64
  • 4Whitcomb DC. Clinical practice. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med, 2006,354:2142-2150.
  • 5Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X,et al. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut, 2008, 57:1698-1703.
  • 6Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2009,104 : 966-971.
  • 7Ranson JH, Pasternack BS. Statistical methods for quantifying the severity of clinical acute pancreatitis. J Surg Res, 1977,22:79-91.
  • 8Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 1974,61 : 44:3-451.
  • 9Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, et al. Acute panereatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology, 1990,174:331-336.
  • 10Bahhazar EJ, Freeny PC, vanSonnenberg E. Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology, 1994,193 : 297- 306.

共引文献1311

同被引文献8

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部