期刊文献+

对汉语时空型句子中模糊表达式“两”和“几”认知模式实验研究 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 英、汉时空型句子中的模糊表达式的常用扩展义及其认知模式是各有特点、不能一概而论的。文章首先介绍了英语时空模糊表达式的认知属性和模式假说及其对汉语模糊表达式“两”和“几”的适用程度。在此基础上研究人员利用DMDX语言记录分析系统分别记录受试者在无语境和有语境情况下,对“两”和“几”扩展义的反应用时。通过对比分析相关数据,研究人员发现同为时空迷糊表达式,但“两”和“几”的认知结果和认知过程不尽相同。“两”的扩展义凸显度很高并呈现出语义固化的解义倾向。“几”的扩展义凸显程度相对较低,但仍符合“等级凸显假设”认知模式中“凸显义优先处理”原则。
作者 李然
机构地区 天津农学院
出处 《江苏外语教学研究》 2014年第1期46-50,共5页 Jiangsu Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目编号:10YJC740059)的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1宫同喜.R. Giora的“等级凸显假设”观点介绍[J].当代语言学,2009,11(3):275-278. 被引量:9
  • 2RACHEL GIORA.Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis[J].Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic Bibliography).2009(3)
  • 3Anne Bezuidenhout,J.Cooper Cutting.Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing[J].Journal of Pragmatics.2002(4)
  • 4Raymond W. Gibbs,Jessica F. Moise.Pragmatics in understanding what is said[J].Cognition.1996(1)

二级参考文献11

  • 1Gibbs, R. W. Jr.,1994. The Poetics of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Gibbs, R. W. Jr., 2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated~.Journal of Pragmatics 34,457 - 86.
  • 3Gibbs, R. W. Jr. and R. J. Grrig. 1989. How context makes metaphor comprehension seem'special'. Met- aphor and Symbolic Activity 4,3 : 145 - 58.
  • 4Glucksberg, S. 1989. Metaphors in conversation: How are they understood? Why are they used? Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 4,3 : 125 - 43.
  • 5Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds. Speech Acts: Syntax and se- mantics. Vol. 3, Pp. 41 - 58. New York : Academic Press.
  • 6Grice, H. P.1978. Some further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds. Pragmatics:Syntax and semantics. Vol. 9, Pp. 113 - 27. New York: Academic Press.
  • 7Giora, R. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 7,1:183 -206.
  • 8Giora, R. 1999. On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31:919 -29.
  • 9Giora, R. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 10Searle, J. 1979. Metaphor. In A. Ortony, ed., Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 92 - 123.

共引文献8

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部