期刊文献+

基于模糊逻辑的信号交叉口人车冲突判别方法 被引量:5

Fuzzy logic based pedestrian-vehicle conflict discrimination at signalized intersection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用视频图像处理技术提取交叉口人车冲突基本数据。采用冲突时间差和车辆速度两个特征对人车冲突安全性进行分析,并由此构建相应的隶属度函数,确定了人车冲突安全等级,设计了基于模糊逻辑规则的信号交叉口人车冲突判别方法。通过与人工判别结果对比,验证了本文方法的有效性,本文建立的基于模糊逻辑的人车冲突判别模型准确率超过85%。 Image processing technology was used to extract the basic data of pedestrian-vehicle conflict. Time Difference to Collision (TDTC) and the vehicle speed were selected as the features for pedestrian-vehicle conflict analysis. Based on the analysis, the corresponding membership functions of the two features are constructed to distinguish the safety level of the conflict. The proposed method is compared with of artificial discrimination. Results demonstrate that the proposed method is reliable and has good performance. The discriminating accuracy of the method is higher than 85 %.
出处 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期637-641,共5页 Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51108208 51278220) 中国博士后面上基金项目(20110491307) 中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2013T60330) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(201103146) 吉林省科技发展计划项目(20130522121JH)
关键词 交通运输系统工程 行人安全 冲突判别 模糊逻辑 engineering of communications and transportataion system pedestrian safety conflict discrimination fuzzy logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1郭伟伟,曲昭伟,王殿海.交通冲突判别模型[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2011,41(1):35-40. 被引量:25
  • 2裴玉龙,冯树民.基于交通冲突的行人过街危险度研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007,39(2):285-287. 被引量:26
  • 3王俊骅,方守恩.路段行人-机动车冲突观测方法及冲突特性[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2008,36(4):503-507. 被引量:15
  • 4Ashton S. A preliminary assessment of the potential for pedestrian injury reduction through vehicle design[C]// Proceedings of the 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference, San Diego, USA, 1982: 373-394.
  • 5Hayward J. Near miss determination through use of a scale of danger[R]. Penn, USA: Pennsylvania State University, 1972.
  • 6Varhelyi A. Dynamic speed adaptation based on information teehnology-a theoretical background [D]. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1996.
  • 7Chin, H C, Quek S T. Measurement of traffic conflicts [J]. Safety Science, 1997, 26(3): 169-187.
  • 8Hupfer C. Computer aided image processing to modify traffic conflicts technique[D]. University Kaiserslautern, Transportation Department, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1997.
  • 9Cafiso S,Garcia G A,Cavarra R,et al. Pedestrian crossing safety improvements: Before and after study using traffic conflict teehniques[C]//Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting,Washington D C,2010.
  • 10Zhang Y Y, Yao D Y, Qiu T Z, et al. Pedestrian safe- ty analysis in mixed traffic conditions using video data [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012, 13(4): 1832-1844.

二级参考文献18

  • 1曲昭伟,李志慧,胡宏宇,郭伟伟,魏巍.基于视频处理的无信号交叉口交通冲突自动判别方法[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2009,39(S2):163-167. 被引量:9
  • 2黄文忠,杨佩昆.无控制人行横道处的行人和机动车延误分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),1995,23(1):31-36. 被引量:37
  • 3唐阳山,李江,田育耕,陈昕.交通冲突量的混沌预测[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2005,35(6):646-648. 被引量:3
  • 4张学亮,邓卫,郭唐仪.基于冲突率的交叉口交通安全评价方法研究[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2007,5(1):85-90. 被引量:21
  • 5DHILLON P K,LIGHTDSTORE A S,PEEK-ASa C. Assessment of hospital and police ascertainment of automobile versus childhood pedestrian and bicyclist collisions [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2001,33:29-537.
  • 6杨佩昆,张树升.交通管理与控制[M].北京:人民交通出版社.1993.
  • 7Kittleson Associates, Inc. and ITE Institute. Traffic coflict Studies Report[ R]. working paper 5 for NCHRP Project 3 - 54,1999.
  • 8Kulmala, R. Measuring safety effect of road measures at junctions [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,1994, 26(6) :781 -794.
  • 9Tarek Sayed, Sany Zein. Traffic Conflict Models and Standards for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections[C]//2nd Transportation Specialty Conference, Halifax: [ s. n. ] ,1998,10 - 13.
  • 10Hoong-Chor Chin, Ser-Tong Quek. Measurement of traffic conflicts[J]. Safety Science. 1997,26(3):169-185.

共引文献61

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部