期刊文献+

非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变检测与临床意义 被引量:10

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation and Its Clinical Significance in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用荧光PCR法对199例晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)组织进行表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变检测,分析EGFR基因突变的分布特征及其与临床病理特征的相关性。结果显示56例(28.1%)存在EGFR基因突变,其中27例(13.6%)为外显子19突变,25例(12.6%)为外显子21突变,2例为外显子18突变,1例外显子20突变,1例外显子18和20的共突变。另外,除广东及安徽省铜陵市外,辽宁地区NSCLC患者EGFR基因突变率及主要突变类型与其他地区相符,常见于外显子19、21突变,其中腺癌、不吸烟患者突变率更高,更适宜EGFR-TKI靶向治疗。 The real-time fluorescence PCR were used to detect EGFR mutations in 199 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissue specimens ,and the relationship between EGFR mutations and clinicopathological features were analyzed .EGFR gene mutation occurred in 56 (28 .1% ) patients with NSCLC .Exon 19 mutation occurred in 27 patients (13 .6% ) ,exon 21 mutation occurred in 25 patients (12 .6% ) ,exon 18 and exon 20 mutations occurred in 2 patients respectively ,and 1 patient was detected with both exon 18 and exon 20 mutations .The EGFR mutation rate and the main mutation types of NSCLC patients in Liaoning province in China are basically identical with other regions except Guangdong and Tongling in Anhui ,which was common in exon 19 and 21 mutations .The mutation rate of patients with adenocarcinoma and non-smoking patients was higher ,and more suitable for EGFR-TKI targeted therapy .
作者 梁媛 马锐
出处 《医学与哲学(B)》 2014年第4期70-72,82,共4页 Medicine & Philosophy(B)
基金 辽宁省社会发展攻关计划项目 项目编号:2011020215-411
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 表皮生长因子受体 突变 non-small cell lung cancer epidermal growth factor receptor mutation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献60

共引文献98

同被引文献151

  • 1万华,邹强,董佳容,吴雪卿,王红鹰,周坚,陆德铭.乳腺癌患者免疫指标检测及其临床意义[J].肿瘤,2006,26(3):279-281. 被引量:26
  • 2杨曌,牛微,尚小云,吴玉章,赵建平,王莉.肝癌患者CD4^+CD25^+调节性T细胞的检测及其临床意义[J].中国癌症杂志,2007,17(1):62-64. 被引量:12
  • 3Liu Z M,Liu L N,Li M,et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in gastric cancer[J]. Pathology, 2011 ,43 (3) : 234 - 238.
  • 4Li u Z M, Liu L N, Li M, et al. Mutation detection of KRAS by highresolution melting analysis in Chinese with gastric cancer[J]. Oncol Rep,2009,22(3) :515-520.
  • 5Tsuchihashi Z, Kharnbata-Ford S, Hanna N, et a1. Responsiveness to cetuximab without mutations in EGFR[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(2) :208-209.
  • 6Nagahara H,Mimori K,Ohta Mv et a1. Somatic mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor in colorectal carcinoma[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, II( 4) : 1368-1371.
  • 7Huang C W, Tsai H L, Chen Y T, et al. The prognostic values of EGFR expression and KRAS mutation in patients with synchronous or metachronous metastatic color ectal cancer [J]. BMC Cancer, 2013,13(1) :599.
  • 8Levidou G, Saetta A A, Gigelou F, et a1. ERK/ pERK expression and B-raf mutations in colon adenocarcinomas: correlation with clinicopathological characteristics[J]. World] Surg On col , 2012,10: 47.
  • 9Cushman-Vokoun A M,Stover D G,Zhao Zver a1. Clinical utility of KRAS and BRAF mutations in a cohort of patients with colorectal neoplasms submitted for microsatellite instability testing [J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2013,12 (3) : 16S -17S.
  • 10Li Z, Chen Y, Wang D, et a1. Detection of KRAS mutations and their associations with clinicopathological features and survival in Chinese colorectal cancer patientsj I}. J Int Med Res,2012,40(4): 15S9-159S.

引证文献10

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部