期刊文献+

基于演化博弈的讨价还价策略研究 被引量:13

Evolutionary game analysis on bargaining strategies
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过建立"双种群"复制动态模型,研究了有限理性假设下"多对多"讨价还价的策略演化问题,证明了只有严格纳什均衡才能成为"多对多"讨价还价的演化稳定策略.并利用计算机仿真发现:当买卖双方种群的初始策略为随机分布时,讨价还价的演化稳定策略以最大概率收敛到对称纳什均衡,产生买卖双方最大初始期望收益乘积的纳什均衡可以比较准确地预测"多对多"讨价还价的演化稳定策略,且演化过程不必是单调的.研究内容有助于理解"多对多"讨价还价的达成协议的一般规律,为设计多边谈判支持系统提供参考和借鉴. By constructing a model of replicator dynamics with two disjoint populations, this paper studies the evolution of strategies in a many-to-many bargaining based on the assumption that traders are boundedly rational. It is proved that only strict Nash equilibriums can be the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) in the bargaining. Simulation results show that the ESS converges to the symmetric Nash equilibrium with the maximal probability if fractions of buyers' and sellers' strategies are randomly initialized. Moreover, the Nash equilibrium, which generates the maximal product of initial expected return of two sides, accurately predicts the ESS in most cases. Finally, the evolutionary process of ESS is not necessary to be monotonous. The result helps to understand the general pattern in which a many-to-many bargaining comes to terms, and serves as reference for designing multilateral negotiation support system.
作者 詹文杰 邹轶
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期1181-1187,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70871045) 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金
关键词 讨价还价 演化博弈 纳什均衡 演化稳定策略 bargaining evolutionary game theory Nash equilibrium evolutionarily stable strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1谢识予.经济博弈论[M].3版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2010:348.
  • 2Nash J.The bargaining problem[J].Econometrica,1950,18(2):155-162.
  • 3Nash J.Two-person cooperative games[J].Econometrica,1953,21(1):128-140.
  • 4Rubinstein A.Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model[J].Econometrica,1982,50(1):97-109.
  • 5Fudenberg D,Tirole J.Sequential bargaining with incomplete information[J].Review of Economic Studies,1983,50(2):221-247.
  • 6Rubinstein A.A bargaining model with incomplete information about time preferences[J].Econometrica,1985,53(5):1151-1172.
  • 7Binmore K,Rubinstein A,Wolinsky A.The Nash bargaining solution in economic modeling[J].The RAND Journal of Economics,1986,17(2):176-188.
  • 8Ausubel L M,Cramton P,Deneckere R J.Bargaining with incomplete information[M]//Handbook of Game Theory.Amsterdan:Elsevier,2002,Chapter 50.
  • 9马本江,邱菀华.一次交易中的讨价还价策略及其博弈分析[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(4):123-125. 被引量:5
  • 10苏秦,刘强.单买方多供应商多边谈判中的买方策略选择[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010,30(6):1002-1009. 被引量:2

二级参考文献75

  • 1蔡志明.议价行为的博弈理论与博弈实验研究[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,31(6):68-74. 被引量:11
  • 2Abreu D,Pearce DG.A perspective on renegotiation in repeated games[M].Selten MR,ed.Game Equilibrium Models.Springer Verlag,Berlin,1991.
  • 3Ganesh I,Villas-Boas JM.A bargaining theory of distribution channels[J].Journal of marketing research,2003,XL:80-100.
  • 4Anthony JD,Esther Gal-Or,Kannan S.Channel bargaining with retailer asymmetry[J].Journal of marketing research,forthcoming,2005.
  • 5Terry AT,Erica LP.Simple relational contracts to motivate capacity investment:Price only vs price and quantity[J].Manufacturing & service operations management,2007,9(1):94-113.
  • 6Tausev G,Anthony JD,Kannan S.Stretgic manufacturer response to a dominant retailer[J].Marketing Science,2007,26(2):164-178.
  • 7Atkins D,Krishnan H,Zhno X.Renegotiation-proof relational contracts in supply chains[R].Working paper,Sauder School of Business,University of British Columbia,2006.
  • 8Kadiyali V,Pradeep C,Nanfel V.Manufacturer-retailer channel interactions and implications for channel power:An empirical investigation of pricing in a local market[J].Marketing science,2000,19(2):127-148.
  • 9Nash JF.The bargaining problem[J].Econometrica,1950,18(2):155-162.
  • 10Binmore,Osborne M,Rubinstein A.Noncooperative Models of Bargaining[M].Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,1992,Vol.1,R.Aumann and S.Hart,eds.Amsterdam:North-Holland.

共引文献387

同被引文献146

引证文献13

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部