期刊文献+

国际合法性与大国责任的变化 被引量:7

International Legitimacy and the Changes of Great Powers'Responsibilities
原文传递
导出
摘要 国际社会是由变化着的合法性原则构成的,而合法性的核心原则涉及国际社会合法成员和合适行为愿意受约束的责任问题。这种受约束的义务来自于国家的成员地位。除了成员国的一般责任外,国际社会还存在着只有少数几个大国才能承担的特殊责任。特殊责任的分配往往涉及其他国家的认可,这种认可赋予了大国角色以合法性,并使其享有一定范围的特权和责任。同时,特殊责任的分配也是一种独特的合法性实践,它大致是围绕各国主权平等和大国特权之间的关系展开的。虽然特殊责任的分配在不同时期会有所不同,但它基本上按照合法性原则的要求确定。大国特殊责任的分配本质上是为了解决国际社会中的主权平等原则与物质力量分配不平衡之间的矛盾,以更好地维持国际秩序的有序运行。 The research on legitimacy and the responsibilities of great powers could only be appropriately understood within the framework of international society. Because the international society is founded on evolving principles of legitimacy, the core principle of which requires a willingness to be bound by a socially derived set of constraints as conditions for membership. The constraints include both particular conceptions of rightful membership of the international society, and particular conceptions of rightful conduct within it. Essentially, the social constraints are the obligations Each state's obligations come which states as members o{ from its membership status international society should fulfilh The members of that community relinquish their absolute sovereignty in exchange for membership, and they are willing to accept constraints of a set of generally applicable principles and rules. Therefore, if a state would like to obtain recognition from other states, the prerequisite is that the state must fulfill the basic obligations of membership in the international society. The most fundamental obligation of a state is its compliance with the principle of sovereign equality among states.
作者 章前明
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期177-187,共11页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"从国际合法性视角看中国的国际责任" 浙江省教育厅重点课题(Z201016632)
关键词 国际社会 国际合法性 大国特殊责任 主权平等 物质力量分配 international society international legitimacy great powers' special responsibilities sovereign equality the allocation of material powers
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1H. Bull, The Anarchical Society : A Study of Order in World Politics, London: Macmillan PressLTD, 1995.
  • 2I. Clark, Legitimacy in International Society , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 3伊恩.克拉克,林小芳.国际社会与中国:规范的权力和权力的规范[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2013,43(5):57-69. 被引量:6
  • 4J. Crawford & J. Watkins, "International Responsibility" in S. Besson & J. TasioulasCeds. ) , The Philosophyof International Law , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 , pp. 282 - 298.
  • 5M. Bukovansky,I. Clark & R. Eckersley et al. , Special Responsibilities : Global Problems and AmericanPowrr , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  • 6T. M. Franck,The Power of Legitimacy among Nations , Oxford: Oxford University Press,1990.
  • 7[英]詹宁斯、[英]瓦茨修订:《奥本海国际法》第1卷第1分册,王铁崖、陈公绰、汤宗舜等译,北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1995 年.
  • 8M. Wight, Systems of States,Leicester: LeicesterUniversity Press, 1977.
  • 9A. Hurrell,"Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-be Great Power-" InternationalA f fairs,Vol. 82,No. 1(2006),pp. 1 - 19.
  • 10H. Bull, "The Great Irresponsibles- The United States,the Soviet Union, and World Order" InternationalJournal,Vol. 35,No. 3(1980),pp. 437 - 447.

二级参考文献53

  • 1G. J. Ikenberry, "The Future of the Liberal World Order ," Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 3 (2011), pp. 56 - 68.
  • 2X. Zhang, "China in the Conception of International Society: The English School's Engagements with China," Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2(2011), pp. 763- 786.
  • 3K. Rudd, "A Journey to the Middle Kingdom," New Statesman, Vol. 141, No. 5114(2012), p. 46.
  • 4X. Zhang, "A Rising China and the Normative Changes in International Society," East Asia : An International Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 3(2011), pp. 235 - 246.
  • 5L. Xia, "China: A Responsible Great Power," Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 10, No. 26(2001), pp. 17 - 25.
  • 6Y. Zhang, China in International Society since 1949, I3asingstoke: Macmillan, 1998.
  • 7Y. Zhang & G. Austin(eds. ), Power and Responsibility in Chinese Foreign Policy, Canberra: Asia Pacific Press, 2001.
  • 8Y. Deng, China's Struggle for Status : The Realignment of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  • 9C. Navari, "Introduction: Methods and Methodology in the English School," in C. Navari(ed. ), Theorising International Society : English School Methods, Houndmills: Palgrave, 2009, pp. 1 - 20.
  • 10M. Finnemore, National Interests in International Society, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.

共引文献6

同被引文献100

引证文献7

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部