期刊文献+

呼气末二氧化碳分压在感染性休克患者容量反应性评估中的作用 被引量:14

The role of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure in fluid responsiveness assessment in septic shock patient
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)在感染性休克患者容量反应性评估中的作用.方法 入选无自主呼吸完全机械控制通气、需要进行容量负荷试验的感染性休克患者,记录容量负荷试验前后PETCO2、中心静脉压(CVP)、心率、平均动脉压,脉压差(PP)、心指数(CI)的变化,ROC曲线评价PETCO2、PP评估容量反应性的价值.结果 (1)入选48例感染性休克患者,其中34例有容量反应性,14例无容量反应性.容量负荷试验后,有反应者△CI为(0.85±0.47)L·min.·m-2,△PETCO2为(3.5 ±2.5)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),高于无反应者[(0.05±0.27)L·min-·m-2;(0.5±1.5) mmHg;P<0.05].(2)容量负荷试验后△PETCO2与△CI呈正相关(r=0.772,P<0.05),△PP与△CI呈正相关(r=0.598,P<0.05).(3)容量负荷试验前后△PETCO2比例评估容量反应性的AUCROC为0.943,以5%为临界值,△PETCO2 >5%时评估容量反应性的敏感性为87.9%,特异性为93.4%.△PP比例评估容量反应性的AUCRoC为0.801,以10%为临界值,△PP> 10%时评估容量反应性的敏感性为68.1%,特异性为73.2%.结论 机械通气感染性休克患者容量负荷试验引起PETC02的变化可以反映CI的变化,能有效评估容量反应性,其敏感性和特异性均比△PP更佳. Objective To assess whether end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PET CO2) can predict the fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.Methods Septic shock patients under mechanical ventilation without spontaneous breathing and with the need of a fluid challenge test were included in this study.Heart rate,central venous pressure,pulse pressure,PErCO2,and CI before and after the fluid challenge test were conducted in all the patients.Results Of the 48 septic shock patients included,34 had preload responsiveness,14 had no responsiveness.△CI and △PET CO2 after the fluid challenge test in " volume responders" were (0.85 ± 0.47) L · min-1 · m-2 and (3.5 ± 2.5) mmHg respectively,which were higher than those in "no volume responders" (P < 0.05).The fluid-induced changes in PET CO2 and CI were correlated (r =0.072,P < 0.05).The AUCRoc of fluid challenge-induced △PET CO2 as the predictor for volume responsiveness was 0.943,and its sensitivity was 87.9% and specificity was 93.4% with a critical value of 5%.The AUCRoc of △PP as the predictor for volume responsiveness was 0.801,and its sensitivity was 68.1% and specificity was 73.2% with a critical value of 10%.Conclusion The changes of PETCO2 induced by a fluid challenge test can predict fluid responsiveness with reliability,and have a better sensitivity and specificity than the changes of PP.
出处 《中华内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期359-362,共4页 Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
关键词 休克 脓毒性 容量反应性 呼气末二氧化碳分压 容量负荷试验 血流动力学监测 Shock, septic Volume responsiveness End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure Fluid challenge Cardiac output monitoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence [ J ]. Chest,2002,121 : 2000-2008.
  • 2Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, et al. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality [ J ]. Crit Care Med,2011,39 :259-265.
  • 3Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL Hemodynamie paraeters to guide fluid therapy[ J] Ann Intensive Care,2011,1 : 1. Lamia B, Chem|a D, Richard C, et al. Clinical review: interpretation of arterial pressure wave in shock states [ J ]. Crit Care ,2005,9:601-606.
  • 4Monnet X,Teboul JL. Passive leg raising[ J]. Intensive Care Med, 2008.34:659-663.
  • 5Monnet X ,Teboul JL Passive leg raising[ J ]. Intensive Care Med, 2008,34:659-663.
  • 6De Backer D,Pinsky MR. Can one predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? [ J]. Intensive Care Med,2007, 33:1111-1113.
  • 7Tautz TJ, Urwyler A, Antognini JF, et al. Case scenario : Increased end-tidal carbon dioxide: a diagnostic dilemma [ J ]. Anesthesiology ,2010,112 : 440-446.
  • 8Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference [ J ]. Crit Care Med,2003 ,31:1250-1256.
  • 9Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine [ J ]. Chest, 1992,101 : 1644-1655.
  • 10Monnet X,Persichini R,Ktari M,et al. Precision of the transpulmonary thermodilution measurements[ J ]. Crit Care,2011,15 : R204.

同被引文献155

  • 1杨明华,林智平,叶允荣.不同潮气量机械通气下肺癌根治术病人动脉血二氧化碳分压与呼气末二氧化碳分压的关系[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(1):86-87. 被引量:30
  • 2钱文伟,沈家宜,孔颂阳,许林海.ETCO_2和SpO_2监测与动脉血气的比较分析[J].中华实验外科杂志,1996,13(3):168-168. 被引量:6
  • 3姜辉,俞森洋,王立万.智能监护脱机模式与间断停机方法在老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者脱机中的比较[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(8):545-548. 被引量:22
  • 4Boyd JH, Forbes J,Nakada TA, et al. Fluid resuscitation inseptic shock : a positive fluid balance and elevated central venouspressure are associated with increased mortality [ J ]. Crit CareMed,2011,39 (2) : 259-265.
  • 5Marik PE,Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressurepredict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literatureand the tale of seven mares [ J ]. Chest,2008,134 (1) : 172-178.
  • 6Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are notappropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge[J ]. Crit Care Med,2007,35 (1) : 64-68.
  • 7Loupec T,Nanadoumgar H, Frasca D,et al. Pleth variability indexpredicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients [ J ]. CritCare Med,2011,39 (2) : 294-299.
  • 8Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Roullet S, et al. A comparison ofstroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system andaortic Doppler echocardiography [ J ] . Anesth Analg,2009,109(2):466-469.
  • 9Bilchick KC,Wise RA. Paradoxical physical findings described byKussmaul : pulsus paradoxus and Kussmaul's sign [ J ]. Lancet,2002,359(9321) : 1940-1942.
  • 10Vaisrub S. Editorial : Paradoxical pulsus paradoxus [ J ]. JAMA,1974,229(1):74.

引证文献14

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部