期刊文献+

颈动脉支架治疗缺血性脑血管病的疗效分析及并发症探讨 被引量:4

Analysis of effects and complications of carotid angioplasty and stenting for treatment of cerebrovascular diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结颈动脉狭窄支架成形术的经验,评价其疗效,分析其并发症。方法对62例颈动脉中重度狭窄患者在脑保护装置下使用自膨式支架行颈动脉支架成形术,总结手术经验,观察其疗效,分析其近期及远期并发症。结果手术成功率100%,术后残余狭窄<20%。13例术中出现血压心率明显降低,3例术后出现低血压、心动过缓,5例出现穿刺处皮下血肿,1例出现股动脉假性动脉瘤,1例出现脑栓塞,1例出现脑出血,2例分别在3个月及半年后复查发现支架内再狭窄。结论颈动脉支架成形术是治疗颈动脉狭窄相对安全、有效的方法,但其并发症仍值得我们警惕及预防。 Objective To summarize the experience, evaluate the effect, and analyze the complications of carotid angioplasty and stenting. Methods Sixty-two patients with moderate-to-severe carotid stenosis were chosen as subjects, and under- went carotid angioplasty and stenting with self-expanding stents and embolic protection device. Then we summarized the experi- ence, evaluated the effect, and analyzed the recent and long-term complications. Results The success rate of the surgery was 100%, and the residual stenosis after surgery was less than 20%. Thirteen patients had distinct decline of blood pressure and heart rate during the surgery, while 3 patients ~ad continuous decline after surgery. Subcutaneous hematoma in the puncture ar- ea was found in 5 patients and a pseudoaneurysm of femoral artery was found in 1 patient. 1 patient had intracranial hemorrhage in the perioperative period, and 1 patient had cerebral embolism during the surgery. In-stent restenosis was found in 2 patients after 3 months or 6 months reexamination. Conclusion Carotid angioplasty and stenting is a relatively safe and effective method in the treatment of carotid stenosis. But we should notice and try to prevent the complications.
出处 《福建医药杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期9-13,共5页 Fujian Medical Journal
基金 福建省卫生厅青年科研课题(2011-1-7)
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 支架成形术 并发症 carotid stenosis angioplasty and stenting complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Rantner B, Kollerits B, Schmidauer C, et al. Carotid endarter- ectomy within seven days after the neurological index event is safe and effective in stroke prevention [J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011, 42 (6)z .732-739.
  • 2Coward L J, Featherstone R L, Brown M M. Safety and effica- cy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence [J]. Stroke, 2005, 36 (4): 905-911.
  • 3凌锋,焦力群,代表国家"十五"医学攻关脑卒中规范化外科治疗技术推广应用研究课题组.颈动脉内膜剥脱术与支架成形术对颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄治疗的初步研究[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2006,3(1):4-8. 被引量:60
  • 4Nieosia A, Nikas D, Castriota F, et al. Classification for ca- rotid artery stenting complications: manifestation, management, and prevention [J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2010, 17 (3): 275-294.
  • 5Lieb M, Shah U, Hines GL. Cerebral hyperperfusion syn- drome ater carotid intervention: a review [J]. Cardiol Rev,2012, 20 (2): 84-89.
  • 6Lal B K, Beach K W, Roubin G S, et al. Restenosis after ca- rotid artery stentiog and endarterectomy: a secondary analysis of CREST, a randomized controlled trial [J]. Lancet Neurol,2012, 11 (9): 755-763.
  • 7EskandariMK, Usmsn A A, Garcia-TocaM, et al. Eight-year institutional review of carotid artery stenting [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51 (5): 1145-1151.

二级参考文献19

  • 1[1]Jordan WD Jr,Schroeder PT,Fisher WS,et al.A comparison of angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis.Ann Vasc Surg,1997,11:2-8.
  • 2[2]Jordan WD Jr,Voellinger DC,Doblar DD,et al.Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy.Cardiovasc Surg,1999,7:33-38.
  • 3[3]Poppert H,Wolf O,Resch M,et al.Differences in number,size and location of intracranial microembolic lesions after surgical versus endovascular treatment without protection device of carotid artery stenosis.J Neurol,2004,251:1198-1203.
  • 4[4]Mericle RA,Kim SH,Lanzino G,et al.Carotid artery angioplasty and use of stents in high-risk patients with contralateral occlusions.J Neurosurg,1999,90:1031-1036.
  • 5[5]Hobson RW,GoldsteinJE,Jamil Z,et al.Carotid restenosis:operative and endovascular management.J Vasc Surg,1999,29:228-235.
  • 6[6]Aburahma F,Bates MC,Stone PA,et al.Comparative study of operative treatment and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for recurrent carotid disease.J Vasc Surg,2001,34:831-838.
  • 7[7]Jordan WD Jr,Alcocer F,Wirthlin DJ,et al.High-risk carotid endarterectomy:challenges for carotid stent protocols.J Vasc Surg,2002,35:16-21.
  • 8[8]Illig KA,Zhang R,Tanski W,et al.Is the rationale for carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients excluded from NASCET/ACAS or eligible for ARCHeR justified.? J Vasc Surg,2003,37:575-581.
  • 9[9]Kasirajan K,Matteson B,Marek JM,et al.Comparison of nonneurological events in high-risk patients treated by carotid angioplasty versus endarterectomy.Am J Surg,2003,185:301-304.
  • 10[10]Bowser N,Bandyk DF,Evans A,et al.Outcome of carotid stent-assisted angioplasty versus open surgical repair of recurrent carotid stenosis.J Vasc Surg,2003,38:432-438.

共引文献59

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部